> From: "Germano Massullo"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2015 5:43:42 PM
> Subject: Re: dnf is completly broken
:)
> Il 04/10/2015 16:32, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 4, 20
Il 04/10/2015 16:32, Neal Gompa ha scritto:
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Germano Massullo
> mailto:germano.massu...@gmail.com>>wrote:
>
> In past days I experienced the following problem
> "dnf install" exits if there is a non existing package in the
> requested
> packages lis
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Germano Massullo <
germano.massu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In past days I experienced the following problem
> "dnf install" exits if there is a non existing package in the requested
> packages list"
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268606
>
>
Do you hav
In past days I experienced the following problem
"dnf install" exits if there is a non existing package in the requested
packages list"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268606
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fed
On Sun, 2015-09-27 at 13:39 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> BTW, I don't like dnf either. I think it doesn't actually solve any
> of
> the real problems of yum, and the whole "recommends" thing is
> destabilizing as hell.
Weak dependencies are a new RPM feature, nothing particularly to do
with
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 27.09.2015 um 19:08 schrieb Josef Bacik:
>>
>> This is unnecessarily combative and derogatory to a fellow
>> distribution, why are you going out of your way to be mean spirited?
>
>
> because i am tired of regressions over regressinos
Being tired doesn't justify acting like my 5 year old. Thanks,
Josef
On September 27, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.09.2015 um 19:08 schrieb Josef Bacik:
> This is unnecessarily combative and derogatory to a fellow
> distribution, why are you going out of your way to be mean sp
Am 27.09.2015 um 19:08 schrieb Josef Bacik:
This is unnecessarily combative and derogatory to a fellow
distribution, why are you going out of your way to be mean spirited?
because i am tired of regressions over regressinos from replacements of
replacements tyring to sell me improvements whic
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 27.09.2015 um 13:57 schrieb Neal Gompa:
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 27.09.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
>>
>> This is quite tiresome. dnf clearly isn't "completely brok
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 27.09.2015 um 13:57 schrieb Neal Gompa:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 27.09.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
>>
>> This is quite tiresome. dnf clearly isn't "completely brok
Am 27.09.2015 um 13:57 schrieb Neal Gompa:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.09.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
This is quite tiresome. dnf clearly isn't "completely broken". It
may have a bug, but the correct place to put that is in B
There is a bugzilla, ranting on a mailing list every time you hit a bug
makes you an unlikeable person who doesn't get taken seriously. Thanks,
Josef
On Sep 26, 2015 10:21 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
> besides https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263888 and the
> ridicolous size of /var/
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 27.09.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
>
>> This is quite tiresome. dnf clearly isn't "completely broken". It
>> may have a bug, but the correct place to put that is in Bugzilla.
>>
>
> a package manager which pretends "not
You may want to give a look to
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/wiki/Hacking#logging
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Am 27.09.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
This is quite tiresome. dnf clearly isn't "completely broken". It
may have a bug, but the correct place to put that is in Bugzilla.
a package manager which pretends "nothing to do" after rm -rf
/var/cache/dnf/* while there are two fresh bu
Am 27.09.2015 um 13:16 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 04:21:08 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
besides https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263888 and the
With all due respect, there's way too much to read in there without clear
comments that explain your thoughts.
Somet
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 04:21:08 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> besides https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263888 and the
With all due respect, there's way too much to read in there without clear
comments that explain your thoughts.
Sometimes, full output in a terminal can be self-explaini
This is quite tiresome. dnf clearly isn't "completely broken". It
may have a bug, but the correct place to put that is in Bugzilla.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
vir
besides https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263888 and the
ridicolous size of /var/cache/dnf/ in genereal it's unacceptable that
"dnf -v update dbmail-3.1.17-3.fc22.20150927.rh.3.1.17.x86_64.rpm
dbmail-manpages-3.1.17-3.fc22.20150927.rh.3.1.17.x86_64.rpm
dbmail-tools-3.1.17-3.fc22.2015
19 matches
Mail list logo
