Dne 22.7.2017 v 23:26 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:06:42PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Matthew Miller
>>> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 01:42:11PM -0600, Chri
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 01:42:11PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 11:25:48AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> > Here you aren't root so it's not using the same cache, because it can't
> >> > write to the root owned c
On 22/07/17 22:54, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:06:42PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> I dunno; what harm is there in giving the ability to use a separate
>>> user cache for queries? This allows you to do things like repoquery as
>>> an unprivileged user for repos that aren't
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 10:02:49PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Hmmm -- is it a long-running daemon or is it socket activated?
> It's a D-Bus activated service. So, it's like socket activated, except
> it occurs when something makes a D-Bus call to the daemon.
Err, yes, that's what I meant to type
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 11:36:29PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> > So... like dnfdaemon, except with less capabilities?
>> Exactly! How do I use dnfdaemon? I only see the raw python and dbus APIS...
>> Are there any plans to m
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 11:36:29PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > So... like dnfdaemon, except with less capabilities?
> Exactly! How do I use dnfdaemon? I only see the raw python and dbus APIS...
> Are there any plans to make dnfdaemon a primary method of interacting
> with dnf db?
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:06:42PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> > I dunno; what harm is there in giving the ability to use a separate
>> > user cache for queries? This allows you to do things like repoquery as
>> > an unprivileged user for
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 05:26:55PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:06:42PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Matthew Miller
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 01:
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:06:42PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > I dunno; what harm is there in giving the ability to use a separate
> > user cache for queries? This allows you to do things like repoquery as
> > an unprivileged user for repos that aren't enabled by default.
> I'm fine with a layer
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:06:42PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Matthew Miller
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 01:42:11PM -060
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:06:42PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Matthew Miller
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 01:42:11PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> >> I don't know what things the un
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:06:42PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 01:42:11PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >> I don't know what things the unprivileged user can do other than
> >> search and info. But off hand I'd sa
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 01:42:11PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> I don't know what things the unprivileged user can do other than
>> search and info. But off hand I'd say an unprivileged user should not
>> be able to download metadata. Use o
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 01:42:11PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> I don't know what things the unprivileged user can do other than
> search and info. But off hand I'd say an unprivileged user should not
> be able to download metadata. Use one /var/cache/dnf always. And if
> it's stale, just inform th
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 11:25:48AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> > Here you aren't root so it's not using the same cache, because it can't
>> > write to the root owned cache so it creates a temporary cache owned by your
>> > user.
>> Oh. My.
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 11:25:48AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Here you aren't root so it's not using the same cache, because it can't
> > write to the root owned cache so it creates a temporary cache owned by your
> > user.
> Oh. My. God. It makes complete sense, but is also completely
> ridicu
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 22/07/17 17:53, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> Is this expected behavior? Or is it a bug? And if it's a bug, how do I
>> collect the necessary information for a bug report? This problem
>> happens often, but not every day.
>>
>> [chris@f26h Downlo
Completely mindboggling...
$ sudo dnf -v update
[sudo] password for chris:
Loaded plugins: builddep, config-manager, copr, debug,
debuginfo-install, download, generate_completion_cache,
needs-restarting, playground, repoclosure, repograph, repomanage,
reposync
DNF version: 2.5.1
cachedir: /var/ca
On 22/07/17 17:53, Chris Murphy wrote:
Is this expected behavior? Or is it a bug? And if it's a bug, how do I
collect the necessary information for a bug report? This problem
happens often, but not every day.
[chris@f26h Downloads]$ sudo dnf install *rpm
Here you are root.
And then in anothe
Is this expected behavior? Or is it a bug? And if it's a bug, how do I
collect the necessary information for a bug report? This problem
happens often, but not every day.
[chris@f26h Downloads]$ sudo dnf install *rpm
Fedora 26 - x86_64 - Test Updates
534 kB/s | 24 MB 00:46
Fedora 26 - x86_6
20 matches
Mail list logo
