On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:06:42PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > I dunno; what harm is there in giving the ability to use a separate
> > user cache for queries? This allows you to do things like repoquery as
> > an unprivileged user for repos that aren't enabled by default.
> I'm fine with a layered approach, *if* a repo db does not exist for
> root, then it's OK for a user copy to be downloaded, but how about one
> for all users to share rather than each user getting a downloaded copy
> of the same thing?

How? Setuid downloader? Or make it world-writable? Seems sketchy.

> > Hmmmm. The `dnf -C` (or --cacheonly) flag does not seem to work as
> > documented. It says:
[...]
> Yep I've hit this also.

Once this is fixed, I'm going to `alias dnf='dnf -c'` in my own user
account.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mat...@fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to