Re: deluge and flags sub package

2010-06-14 Thread Chen Lei
> Also currently I cannot guess what happens if just "yum update" > is executed. If only deluge-common (in this spec file) is to be > installed, many users may complain "why deluge gtk cannot be found > anymore?" > This coulld be avoid by filling properly Obsoletes field, I test splitting amule and

Re: deluge and flags sub package

2010-06-14 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 06/15/2010 01:27 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > > Anyway I think filing a bug is needed beforehand. > Ok. Here you go https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603906 Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: deluge and flags sub package

2010-06-14 Thread Mamoru Tasaka
Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 06/15/2010 04:51 AM +9:00: > Rahul Sundaram wrote, at 06/15/2010 04:37 AM +9:00: >> On 06/09/2010 09:08 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: >>> >>> I'll check up this part and update the spec. >>> >> >> Since Ankur doesn't have commit access to Deluge, I am going to be >> doing the buil

Re: deluge and flags sub package

2010-06-14 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 06/15/2010 01:21 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > > I think such changes to split deluge package into several > subpackages like -gtk -web -console is rather a big > change and it must be done after filing a RFE bug against > the component, > > (Personally as one of deluge users I don't like this

Re: deluge and flags sub package

2010-06-14 Thread Mamoru Tasaka
Rahul Sundaram wrote, at 06/15/2010 04:37 AM +9:00: > On 06/09/2010 09:08 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: >> >> I'll check up this part and update the spec. >> > > Since Ankur doesn't have commit access to Deluge, I am going to be > doing the build by tom. Here is the latest spec > > http://ankursinha.fed

Re: deluge and flags sub package

2010-06-14 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 06/09/2010 09:08 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > I'll check up this part and update the spec. > Since Ankur doesn't have commit access to Deluge, I am going to be doing the build by tom. Here is the latest spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/deluge/deluge.spec yell, if you find problems,

Re: deluge and flags sub package

2010-06-08 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hey, > > I think image subpackage is not needed, maybe it can merged to > -common subpackage, I've done this so that someone installing only the console/daemon doesn't pull in images. If merged it into common, the images will also be installed (which *probably* aren't being used by console/daem

Re: deluge and flags sub package

2010-06-08 Thread Chen Lei
2010/6/9 Ankur Sinha : > On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 23:21 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:10 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: >> > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 00:56 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> > > I will work with Ankur Sinha and probably do this for Rawhide in the >> > > next couple of da

Re: deluge and flags sub package

2010-06-08 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 23:21 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:10 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 00:56 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > I will work with Ankur Sinha and probably do this for Rawhide in the > > > next couple of days. Peter Gordon, let me kn

Re: deluge and flags sub package

2010-06-08 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:10 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 00:56 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > I will work with Ankur Sinha and probably do this for Rawhide in the > > next couple of days. Peter Gordon, let me know if you have any objections > > This sounds good to me - pl

Re: deluge and flags sub package

2010-06-02 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 06/03/2010 02:40 AM, Peter Gordon wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 00:56 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> I will work with Ankur Sinha and probably do this for Rawhide in the >> next couple of days. Peter Gordon, let me know if you have any objections >> > This sounds good to me - pleas

Re: deluge and flags sub package

2010-06-02 Thread Peter Gordon
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 00:56 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > I will work with Ankur Sinha and probably do this for Rawhide in the > next couple of days. Peter Gordon, let me know if you have any objections This sounds good to me - please go ahead with your changes. (Apologies about the unavailabi

Re: deluge and flags sub package

2010-06-02 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 05/29/2010 12:12 PM, Chen Lei wrote > I'd rather suggest you to split deluge into several subpackages, e.g. > deluge(metapackge) deluge-gtk deluge-console deluge-web deluge-common > or deluge(gtk ui) deluge-console deluge-web deluge-common. > Bundling UI and Core and pulling in gtk2 dependency i

Re: deluge and flags sub package

2010-05-28 Thread Chen Lei
2010/5/28 Rahul Sundaram : > Hi > > Peter Gordon seems to be unreachable and while bumping up to > rb_libtorrent to fix E-V-R, I noticed that deluge has a separate flags > sub package.  I remember this was proposed as a guideline and then > dropped. Do we need a flags sub package anymore?  Seems ra

Re: deluge and flags sub package

2010-05-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 28 May 2010 15:29:59 +0530 Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > Peter Gordon seems to be unreachable and while bumping up to > rb_libtorrent to fix E-V-R, I noticed that deluge has a separate flags > sub package. I remember this was proposed as a guideline and then > dropped. Do we need a fla

deluge and flags sub package

2010-05-28 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi Peter Gordon seems to be unreachable and while bumping up to rb_libtorrent to fix E-V-R, I noticed that deluge has a separate flags sub package. I remember this was proposed as a guideline and then dropped. Do we need a flags sub package anymore? Seems rather pointless. Rahul -- devel m