Il 14/09/2016 19:27, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:11:43 +0200
gil wrote:
hi
_unitdir is no more a vaild rpm macros?
i get:
RPM build errors:
File must begin with "/": %{_unitdir}/wildfly.service
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1563273
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:11:43 +0200
gil wrote:
> hi
>
> _unitdir is no more a vaild rpm macros?
>
> i get:
>
> RPM build errors:
> File must begin with "/": %{_unitdir}/wildfly.service
>
> Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15632734
>
> thanks in advance
You a
hi
_unitdir is no more a vaild rpm macros?
i get:
RPM build errors:
File must begin with "/": %{_unitdir}/wildfly.service
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15632734
thanks in advance
regards
.g
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 11:39:00AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Rex Dieter (rdie...@math.unl.edu) said:
> >
> > The idea is to avoid silly stuff like:
> >
> > BuildRequires: glibc
> > BuildRequires: filesystem
>
> Is it worth just moving systemd into that minimal set?
>
I'm not sure that th
Rex Dieter (rdie...@math.unl.edu) said:
> Till Maas wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:09:26AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >
> >> This is not an arm specific issue. in the past systemd was pulled into
> >> the minimal buildroot via deps. That has changed and its no longer
> >> pulled in.
Till Maas wrote:
>And it also does not
>help when packages FTBS because of new packages added to the build root
>trough dependencies.
If installing another package causes your package to fail to build,
then your package most likely has a bug. Was it relying on autodetection
to disable some feature
Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:09:26AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>> This is not an arm specific issue. in the past systemd was pulled into
>> the minimal buildroot via deps. That has changed and its no longer
>> pulled in. on x86 as well as arm.
>
> Several of my packages now
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 08:25:43AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2013-08-05, Till Maas wrote:
> > Actually the guidelines say otherwise:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2
> >| There is no need to include the following packages or their
> >
On 2013-08-05, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:09:26AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>> This is not an arm specific issue. in the past systemd was pulled into
>> the minimal buildroot via deps. That has changed and its no longer
>> pulled in. on x86 as well as arm.
>
> Several of my
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:09:26AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> This is not an arm specific issue. in the past systemd was pulled into
> the minimal buildroot via deps. That has changed and its no longer
> pulled in. on x86 as well as arm.
Several of my packages now fail to build, because more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 4 Aug 2013 22:39:55 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:56:06 +0800
> Christopher Meng wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Due to f20 mass rebuild[1], I've found that this macro is not
> > presented in armv7 arch.
> >
> > When will this
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:56:06 +0800
Christopher Meng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to f20 mass rebuild[1], I've found that this macro is not
> presented in armv7 arch.
>
> When will this macro be available?
This macro is defined in /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.systemd which is
provided by the 'systemd' p
Hi,
Due to f20 mass rebuild[1], I've found that this macro is not
presented in armv7 arch.
When will this macro be available?
Thanks.
[1]--http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9145/5709145/build.log
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Always playing in Fedora Project
http://cicku.
14 matches
Mail list logo
