Rex Dieter (rdie...@math.unl.edu) said: > Till Maas wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:09:26AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > >> This is not an arm specific issue. in the past systemd was pulled into > >> the minimal buildroot via deps. That has changed and its no longer > >> pulled in. on x86 as well as arm. > > > > Several of my packages now fail to build, because more docs are build, > > e.g. PDF versions appeared. Did someone compile a list of packages that > > were added/removed to the buildroot? > > > >> The packages that are explicitly pulled in are: > >> bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release findutils > >> gawk gcc gcc-c++ grep gzip info make patch redhat-rpm-config > >> rpm-build sed shadow-utils tar unzip util-linux which xz > >> > >> There is no need to BuildRequire any of them, what they pull in is > >> subject to change and should be added as a BuildRequires > > > > Actually the guidelines say otherwise: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2 > > | There is no need to include the following packages or their > > ^^^^^^^^ > > | dependencies as BuildRequires because they would occur too often. > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Turns out the "or their dependencies" part changed in this case, nothing > particularly wrong about that. > > The idea is to avoid silly stuff like: > > BuildRequires: glibc > BuildRequires: filesystem
Is it worth just moving systemd into that minimal set? Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
