Re: Yet another bug caused by SELinux

2014-03-23 Thread Simo Sorce
On Sun, 2014-03-23 at 02:33 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > just to note the facts: this issue could have been resolved much faster, > > and SELinux is not the reason why it wasn't. > > But SELinux is the reason the bug was there in the first place. Without > SELinux, we w

Re: Yet another bug caused by SELinux

2014-03-22 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: > just to note the facts: this issue could have been resolved much faster, > and SELinux is not the reason why it wasn't. But SELinux is the reason the bug was there in the first place. Without SELinux, we wouldn't have had this bug! (Systems without SELinux were not affec

Re: Yet another bug caused by SELinux

2014-03-21 Thread drago01
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > > GHC (Haskell) was broken for (at least) over a year because of a bug in the > workaround for stupid SELinux restrictions: > https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7629 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907515 > > How much

Re: Yet another bug caused by SELinux

2014-03-21 Thread David Beveridge
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > How much breakage will we have to suffer until people finally realize that > SELinux is a horribly flawed idea? > > Kevin Kofler > I'm sure you are entitled to your opinion, and it is quite easy to disable if that's what you want. Ho

Re: Yet another bug caused by SELinux

2014-03-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 12:22 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > > GHC (Haskell) was broken for (at least) over a year because of a bug in the > workaround for stupid SELinux restrictions: > https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7629 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907515 > > How m

Re: Yet another bug caused by SELinux

2014-03-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 12:35 +0100, H. Guémar wrote: > 2014-03-20 12:22 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kofler : > > Hi, > > > > GHC (Haskell) was broken for (at least) over a year because of a bug in the > > workaround for stupid SELinux restrictions: > > https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7629 > > https://bu

Re: Yet another bug caused by SELinux

2014-03-20 Thread H . Guémar
2014-03-20 12:22 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kofler : > Hi, > > GHC (Haskell) was broken for (at least) over a year because of a bug in the > workaround for stupid SELinux restrictions: > https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7629 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907515 > > How much breakage wil

Yet another bug caused by SELinux

2014-03-20 Thread Kevin Kofler
Hi, GHC (Haskell) was broken for (at least) over a year because of a bug in the workaround for stupid SELinux restrictions: https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7629 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907515 How much breakage will we have to suffer until people finally realize that