On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 12:35 +0100, H. Guémar wrote:
> 2014-03-20 12:22 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > GHC (Haskell) was broken for (at least) over a year because of a bug in the
> > workaround for stupid SELinux restrictions:
> > https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7629
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907515
> >
> > How much breakage will we have to suffer until people finally realize that
> > SELinux is a horribly flawed idea?
> >
> >         Kevin Kofler
> >
> > PS: Et ceterum censeo SELinux esse delendum.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> according to the RHBZ ticket, there was a fix but it was not timely
> applied to the package.
> Rather than SELinux, I'd say that the fault lies with the crazy
> updates policy that plague us.

I don't know how you figure that. The update for F20 was submitted on
01-29 and pushed stable on 02-17. For F19 it was submitted 01-29 and
pushed stable on 03-19. Both updates could have been pushed stable as
early as 02-06: as ghc is not a critpath package, the update policy
requires only a 7 day wait unless karma is posted.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to