On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> Related thread when I discovered this issue a couple months ago, and
>> posted to desktop@
>
>
> Might help to include the URL for this...
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/li
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Related thread when I discovered this issue a couple months ago, and
> posted to desktop@
Might help to include the URL for this...
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desk...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TB7LASNQTRMIUEHPA52C3Z
On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 21:53 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Consistent with my earlier findings. I have no idea why packagekitd or
> gnome-software are even running (by default) on liveOS.
This wasn't a live boot. From the description it was clearly an
installed system.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 15:47 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Jerry James wrote:
>
> > For the benefit of anybody with the same problem, the CPU pegged at 100% +
> > unresponsive installer problem is this bug:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=157728
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Jerry James wrote:
>>
>> For the benefit of anybody with the same problem, the CPU pegged at 100% +
>> unresponsive installer problem is this bug:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577282
>>
>
Related thread when I discovered this issue a couple months ago, and
posted to desktop@
I think the top two memory soaking items are the two gnome-shell
instances, one for gdm and one for the user, concurrently. And the
lack of zram.service being enabled on liveOS installations, where DVD
and neti
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> For the benefit of anybody with the same problem, the CPU pegged at 100% +
> unresponsive installer problem is this bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577282
>
> Fortunately, I can give my VM 2 GB to install, but wow. The
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> For work reasons, I need a Fedora 28 VM. I've got a bunch of disk space
> set aside to create logical volumes (LVM) for exactly this purpose, with
> several existing VMs. On this occasion, I decided that I no longer needed
> an older Fedora
For work reasons, I need a Fedora 28 VM. I've got a bunch of disk space
set aside to create logical volumes (LVM) for exactly this purpose, with
several existing VMs. On this occasion, I decided that I no longer needed
an older Fedora VM and decided to recycle it. I got the Fedora 28 x86_64
Work
