On Tue, 2025-04-29 at 19:08 +0200, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I don't know why we didn't catch this in pre-testing;
Hi,
no problem, good the change in behavior was discovered. It's not a bad
thing per se, but it's also true the gnome-software can prepare updates
in the background, at least d
On Tue, 2025-04-29 at 11:54 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 10:02 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> > I'll wait for two weeks and unless some strong objection is arose here
> > I'll do the switch to the dnf5 plugin in rawhide, for the Fedora 43.
>
> Hi,
> I just made an update for
On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 10:02 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> I'll wait for two weeks and unless some strong objection is arose here
> I'll do the switch to the dnf5 plugin in rawhide, for the Fedora 43.
Hi,
I just made an update for the rawhide [1] to do the switch, the
gnome-software-48.1-2.fc4
On Tue, 2025-04-15 at 11:28 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> So is this using the dnf5-daemon over dbus, or is this
> directly invoking dnf5 ?
Hi,
it's using the D-Bus API, calling the dnf5daemon-server under the hood.
Bye,
Milan
--
__
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 5:28 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 14-Apr-25 5:49 PM, Milan Crha wrote:
> > On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:30 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Does it mean we will finally have common history for DNF5 and G-S?
> >
> > Hi,
> > yes, it means both the history and the ca
Hi,
On 14-Apr-25 5:49 PM, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:30 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Does it mean we will finally have common history for DNF5 and G-S?
>
> Hi,
> yes, it means both the history and the cache will be common between the
> two. No more disk space wasting.
So
Quick question: why not using dnf5 backend for PackageKit?
On 2025-04-14 8:51 a.m., Milan Crha wrote:
On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:48 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Common history was always a thing.
Hi,
are you sure? The `pkcon update` is not part of the `dnf4 history`, is
it? I cannot imagin
On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 18:19 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It definitely is.
Ah, I see, you are right, the dnf4 has a history entry from the pkcon.
Nice.
Bye,
Milan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:57 AM Milan Crha wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:48 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Common history was always a thing.
>
> Hi,
> are you sure? The `pkcon update` is not part of the `dnf4 history`, is
> it? I cannot imagine how that could be, but it's a long time
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 6:19 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:57 AM Milan Crha wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:48 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Common history was always a thing.
> >
> > Hi,
> > are you sure? The `pkcon update` is not part of the `dnf4 history`
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 12:14 PM wrote:
>
> Quick question: why not using dnf5 backend for PackageKit?
>
It doesn't exist yet. I haven't been able to write it because I
haven't been able to figure out how to use the DNF5 API. I've asked
for some introductory documentation on how to use the C++ AP
On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:48 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Common history was always a thing.
Hi,
are you sure? The `pkcon update` is not part of the `dnf4 history`, is
it? I cannot imagine how that could be, but it's a long time I looked
on any such thing, thus I could be wrong.
Bye,
On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:30 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Does it mean we will finally have common history for DNF5 and G-S?
Hi,
yes, it means both the history and the cache will be common between the
two. No more disk space wasting.
Bye,
Milan
--
_
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 10:31 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 14. 04. 25 v 10:02 Milan Crha napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> > I'd like to switch gnome-software in rawhide to use a dnf5 plugin
>
>
> Does it mean we will finally have common history for DNF5 and G-S? That
> would be sweet.
>
Common histo
Dne 14. 04. 25 v 10:02 Milan Crha napsal(a):
Hi,
I'd like to switch gnome-software in rawhide to use a dnf5 plugin
Does it mean we will finally have common history for DNF5 and G-S? That
would be sweet.
Vít
, to
move away from its dependency on the PackageKit. This had been
ann
Hi,
I'd like to switch gnome-software in rawhide to use a dnf5 plugin, to
move away from its dependency on the PackageKit. This had been
announced together with the dnf5 change proposal some time ago [1], but
due to some missing work on the gnome-software side it had been
postponed. As the
16 matches
Mail list logo
