On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 5:28 AM Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 14-Apr-25 5:49 PM, Milan Crha wrote: > > On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:30 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Does it mean we will finally have common history for DNF5 and G-S? > > > > Hi, > > yes, it means both the history and the cache will be common between the > > two. No more disk space wasting. > > So is this using the dnf5-daemon over dbus, or is this > directly invoking dnf5 ? The reason why I'm asking is > because even with g-s using dnf5 if it is using libdnf5 > and running as normal user we will still get 2 sets > of repo metadata downloaded, one as root and one as user? >
Yes, there will still be split caches for these scopes. What changes is that root user scope should share a cache and locking. The original reason that PackageKit uses a different cache location is because software centers aggressively refresh. Locking your CLI package manager while PackageKit refreshes metadata was a bad experience in the YUM days. We have always been able to use the regular cache if we wanted to, but we didn't for this reason. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
