On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 11:50:54AM -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > Dne 7.1.2015 v 21:14 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> > > * #1379 F22 System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use libinput
> > > - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg (sgallagh,
> > > 19:51:28)
> > >
- Original Message -
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:58 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> > The Fedora 21 mass rebuild took about 40 hours. ;)
> >>
> >> BTW, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Mass_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 14.1.2015 v 15:53 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:48:16 +0100
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
>
> > Dne 14.1.2015 v 00:24 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> >> On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:58:5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:48:16 +0100
Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dne 14.1.2015 v 00:24 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:58:51 -0700
> > Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 13 Jan 20
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:58 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > The Fedora 21 mass rebuild took about 40 hours. ;)
>>
>> BTW, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Mass_Rebuild is empty.
>> What are the goals o
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 01:53:02 -0600
Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:58 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > The Fedora 21 mass rebuild took about 40 hours. ;)
>
> BTW, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Mass_Rebuild is empty.
> What are the goals of a mass rebuild now, given th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 14.1.2015 v 00:24 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:58:51 -0700
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:50:06 -0700
> > Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> >> You forgot "too many packages?" There are 15842 packages in Fed
- Original Message -
> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:58 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > The Fedora 21 mass rebuild took about 40 hours. ;)
>
> BTW, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Mass_Rebuild is empty.
> What are the goals of a mass rebuild now, given that we just had one
> before F21 B
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:58 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The Fedora 21 mass rebuild took about 40 hours. ;)
BTW, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Mass_Rebuild is empty.
What are the goals of a mass rebuild now, given that we just had one
before F21 Beta?
> That's really not the reason for
Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi said:
> So, while the mass rebuild itself is less than 2 days, it takes a while
> to stablize things after that. If we branched right after the mass
> rebuild we would have to then stablize both rawhide and f22.
One other thing that takes time (as a former mirror ad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:58:51 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:50:06 -0700
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> > You forgot "too many packages?" There are 15842 packages in Fedora
> > 21 and 16230 in Rawhide. That is a lot of packages
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:50:06 -0700
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> You forgot "too many packages?" There are 15842 packages in Fedora 21
> and 16230 in Rawhide. That is a lot of packages that have to be
> rebuilt possibly multiple times due to FTBFS, multiple architectures,
> etc.
>
> 2.5 weeks is
On 13 January 2015 at 15:39, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:24:53PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > > > The reason for "tentative" was mostly so we could get feedback
> > > > > from rel-eng on whether this is actually feasible.
> > It is not even close to feasible.
> [...]
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:24:53PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > > The reason for "tentative" was mostly so we could get feedback
> > > > from rel-eng on whether this is actually feasible.
> It is not even close to feasible.
[...]
> It is still not reasonable to get everything done in that per
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 11:08:30 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 15:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 8.1.2015 v 15:03 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 10:40 +0100, Vít Ondruch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:14:03 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> * #1349 Fedora 22 scheduling strategy (and beyond) (sgallagh,
> 18:41:13)
> * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/22/Schedule
> (mattdm, 18:43:55)
> * change submission dead
> Dne 7.1.2015 v 21:14 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> > * #1379 F22 System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use libinput
> > - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg (sgallagh,
> > 19:51:28)
> > * AGREED: Approved with two caveats: 1) Both GNOME and KDE must be
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 8.1.2015 v 17:08 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 15:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 8.1.2015 v 15:03 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 10:40 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 7.1.201
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 15:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 8.1.2015 v 15:03 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 10:40 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Dne 7.1.2015 v 21:14 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> >>>
> >>> * Tentative date for side-tag merge is 2015-01-28
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 8.1.2015 v 15:03 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 10:40 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 7.1.2015 v 21:14 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
>>>
>>> * Tentative date for side-tag merge is 2015-01-28 (sgallagh,
>>> 19:09:
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 10:40 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 7.1.2015 v 21:14 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> >
> > * Tentative date for side-tag merge is 2015-01-28 (sgallagh,
> > 19:09:55)
> >
>
> What does it mean actually? Does it mean that if I plan to do rebuild of
> Ruby packages in
Hi,
Dne 7.1.2015 v 21:14 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> * #1379 F22 System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use libinput
> - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg (sgallagh,
> 19:51:28)
> * AGREED: Approved with two caveats: 1) Both GNOME and KDE must be
> upd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 7.1.2015 v 21:14 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
>
> * Tentative date for side-tag merge is 2015-01-28 (sgallagh,
> 19:09:55)
>
What does it mean actually? Does it mean that if I plan to do rebuild of
Ruby packages in side-tag, I am supposed
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-01-07)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 18:01:22 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-01-07/fesco.2015-01-07-18.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
24 matches
Mail list logo