Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-10-09 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/10/17 04:13 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On dimanche 8 octobre 2017 21:27:40 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: >> On 08/10/17 01:51 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: >> >>> >>> I've installed it and can’t reproduce your issue: I can start and ad

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-10-09 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On dimanche 8 octobre 2017 21:27:40 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > On 08/10/17 01:51 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > > > > > > I've installed it and can’t reproduce your issue: I can start and add a > > repository just fine. > > I'm sorry I can't help you more. > > > > > > > > Robert-André >

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-10-08 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 08/10/17 01:51 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On dimanche 8 octobre 2017 05:02:11 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: >> On 07/10/17 08:28 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: >>> Hello Luya, >>> >>> I've worked on this issue this afternoon, you can find the resulting SPEC, >>> SRPM and patches here: ht

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-10-08 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 08/10/17 01:51 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > I've installed it and can’t reproduce your issue: I can start and add a > repository just fine. > I'm sorry I can't help you more. > > Robert-André In that case, could you pull request to the main branch as the maintainer is active? Simply fork

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-10-08 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On dimanche 8 octobre 2017 05:02:11 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > On 07/10/17 08:28 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > Hello Luya, > > > > I've worked on this issue this afternoon, you can find the resulting SPEC, > > SRPM and patches here: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/sparkleshare/ > > >

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-10-07 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 07/10/17 08:28 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > Hello Luya, > > I've worked on this issue this afternoon, you can find the resulting SPEC, > SRPM and patches here: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/sparkleshare/ > > The main patch backports the changes made in 2.0 for WebkitGTK 2.0 > compat

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-10-07 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On vendredi 6 octobre 2017 22:24:01 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > On 24/09/17 11:47 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 24 September 2017 at 16:29, Michael Catanzaro > > > > mailto:mike.catanz...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:09 AM, James Hogarth > > > > mailto:james.

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-10-06 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 24/09/17 11:47 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > On 24 September 2017 at 16:29, Michael Catanzaro > mailto:mike.catanz...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:09 AM, James Hogarth > mailto:james.hoga...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Based on the fedora update policy and the ack

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-27 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 21/09/17 08:02 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > s sparkleshare doesn't have its dependency satisfied. > > According to the sparkleshare release notes[0] the 1.3.0; release > added the gtk3 bindings... so any of those ought to help. > > The build dependencies are more complex than I can do in a few m

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-24 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 1:47 PM, James Hogarth wrote: The Sparkeshare 1.5 release removes that dependency fixing the issue and keeping it in Fedora. Having that in F27 and 2.0 in F28 would be most keeping in spirit with our policies I'd suggest. OK, looks like I misunderstood. Sounds good t

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-24 Thread James Hogarth
On 24 September 2017 at 16:29, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:09 AM, James Hogarth > wrote: > >> Based on the fedora update policy and the acknowledged breaking changes >> in 2.0 we should only really update to the most recent 1.x in F27 and below >> at this time. >> >> The

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-24 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 24/09/17 11:17 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On dimanche 24 septembre 2017 20:03:45 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: >> On 24/09/17 07:31 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: >> >>> >>> T >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> >>> I've packaged webkit2-sharp and Sparkleshare 2.0 on COPR. You can grab it >>> >>> her

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-24 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On dimanche 24 septembre 2017 20:03:45 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > On 24/09/17 07:31 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > > > > > > T > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I've packaged webkit2-sharp and Sparkleshare 2.0 on COPR. You can grab it > > > > here: > > > > > > > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-24 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 24/09/17 07:31 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > T > Hello, > > I've packaged webkit2-sharp and Sparkleshare 2.0 on COPR. You can grab it > here: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eclipseo/sparkleshare/ > > Best regards, > > Robert-André > ___

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-24 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:09 AM, James Hogarth wrote: Based on the fedora update policy and the acknowledged breaking changes in 2.0 we should only really update to the most recent 1.x in F27 and below at this time. The latest version should be a self contained change in F28. I haven't been

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-24 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On samedi 23 septembre 2017 23:56:12 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > On 22/09/17 12:09 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 22 Sep 2017 4:46 am, "Luya Tshimbalanga" > > > > wrote: > > On 21/09/17 08:02 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >> On 21 September 2017 at 07:17,

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-23 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 22/09/17 12:09 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > On 22 Sep 2017 4:46 am, "Luya Tshimbalanga" > wrote: > > On 21/09/17 08:02 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> >> >> On 21 September 2017 at 07:17, Luya Tshimbalanga >> mailto:l...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: >> >>

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-22 Thread James Hogarth
On 22 Sep 2017 4:46 am, "Luya Tshimbalanga" wrote: On 21/09/17 08:02 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 21 September 2017 at 07:17, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Sparkleshare package is currently behind upstream which just reach > 2.0[1][2] > The maintainer was contacted for updating the package with

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-21 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 21/09/17 08:02 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > On 21 September 2017 at 07:17, Luya Tshimbalanga > mailto:l...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote: > > Sparkleshare package is currently behind upstream which just reach > 2.0[1][2] > The maintainer was contacted for updating the package with curr

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-21 Thread James Hogarth
On 21 September 2017 at 07:17, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Sparkleshare package is currently behind upstream which just reach > 2.0[1][2] > The maintainer was contacted for updating the package with current broken > dependency below on Fedora 27 and above: > > Problem: package sparkleshare-1.2.0-

State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-20 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Sparkleshare package is currently behind upstream which just reach 2.0[1][2] The maintainer was contacted for updating the package with current broken dependency below on Fedora 27 and above: Problem: package sparkleshare-1.2.0-8.fc26.x86_64 requires mono(webkit-sharp) = 1.1.15.0, but none of t