On 24/09/17 11:47 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > On 24 September 2017 at 16:29, Michael Catanzaro > <mike.catanz...@gmail.com <mailto:mike.catanz...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:09 AM, James Hogarth > <james.hoga...@gmail.com <mailto:james.hoga...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Based on the fedora update policy and the acknowledged > breaking changes in 2.0 we should only really update to the > most recent 1.x in F27 and below at this time. > > The latest version should be a self contained change in F28. > > > I haven't been following this closely, but my understanding is > that if it's not updated, there won't be any Sparkleshare in F27, > since one of the current version's dependencies (WebKitGTK+ 2.4) > is gone. So the update should go into F27 as well (which has not > even reached beta yet, despite the freeze). The updates policy is > very important, but it doesn't trump common sense. :) > > > The Sparkeshare 1.5 release removes that dependency fixing the issue > and keeping it in Fedora. > > Having that in F27 and 2.0 in F28 would be most keeping in spirit with > our policies I'd suggest.
I attempt to build Sparkleshare 1.5 on master but the main issue is the webkitgitk dependency. Suggestion welcome to fix that: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/luya/rpms/sparkleshare/blob/master/f/sparkleshare.spec -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
