Re: Smaller buildroot for Perl packages

2024-05-13 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi - > > OK, build-time dependency changes may not need the side tag but do > > need a spec update to prevent a FTBFS at next build. > > Only those packages that actually need dtrace would require changes. Such > changes could land gradually as needed. They'd have to land at the next respin of e

Re: Smaller buildroot for Perl packages

2024-05-13 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 13. 05. 24 17:11, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: Hi - I also did a test rebuild of all packages directly build-requiring systemtap-sdt-devel and identified these packages that really need the dtrace script: [...] (The logistic challenge there will be side-tag rebuilding all those after a systemtap

Re: Smaller buildroot for Perl packages

2024-05-13 Thread Petr Pisar
V Mon, May 13, 2024 at 11:11:05AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler napsal(a): > > > > > I also did a test rebuild of all packages directly build-requiring > > > > > systemtap-sdt-devel and identified these packages that really need the > > > > > dtrace script: [...] > > > (The logistic challenge there will

Re: Smaller buildroot for Perl packages

2024-05-13 Thread Petr Pisar
V Mon, May 13, 2024 at 04:14:53PM +0200, Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 10. 05. 24 v 14:16 Petr Pisar napsal(a): > > V Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:13:53PM +0200, Lumír Balhar napsal(a): > > > I also did a test rebuild of all packages directly build-requiring > > > systemtap-sdt-devel and identified these

Re: Smaller buildroot for Perl packages

2024-05-13 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi - > > > > I also did a test rebuild of all packages directly build-requiring > > > > systemtap-sdt-devel and identified these packages that really need the > > > > dtrace script: [...] > > (The logistic challenge there will be side-tag rebuilding all those > > after a systemtap subrpm split.) >

Re: Smaller buildroot for Perl packages

2024-05-13 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 10. 05. 24 v 14:16 Petr Pisar napsal(a): V Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:13:53PM +0200, Lumír Balhar napsal(a): I might have an idea how to make building Perl packages faster and their buildroot a little bit smaller. perl-devel depends on systemtap-sdt-devel and that package contains a single sc

Re: Smaller buildroot for Perl packages

2024-05-12 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 10. 05. 24 17:16, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: [...] I also did a test rebuild of all packages directly build-requiring systemtap-sdt-devel and identified these packages that really need the dtrace script: glib2, sssd, qemu, python2.7, postgresql15, postgresql16, perl, php, mariadb10.11, and libvir

Re: Smaller buildroot for Perl packages

2024-05-11 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:13:53PM +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote: > My idea is to split systemtap-sdt-devel into two packages: one with all the > content but without the python script (/usr/bin/dtrace) and a new one > containing only the mentioned script. +1 I think it's weird that a user program (/us

Re: Smaller buildroot for Perl packages

2024-05-10 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi - > [...] > > My idea is to split systemtap-sdt-devel into two packages: one with all the > > content but without the python script (/usr/bin/dtrace) and a new one > > containing only the mentioned script. No objection here. > > [...] > > I also did a test rebuild of all packages directly b

Re: Smaller buildroot for Perl packages

2024-05-10 Thread Petr Pisar
V Fri, May 10, 2024 at 01:13:53PM +0200, Lumír Balhar napsal(a): > I might have an idea how to make building Perl packages faster and their > buildroot a little bit smaller. > > perl-devel depends on systemtap-sdt-devel and that package contains a single > script written in Python and using pycpar

Smaller buildroot for Perl packages

2024-05-10 Thread Lumír Balhar
Hi. I might have an idea how to make building Perl packages faster and their buildroot a little bit smaller. perl-devel depends on systemtap-sdt-devel and that package contains a single script written in Python and using pycparser. The single script bring python3-pycparser and therefore the