V Mon, May 13, 2024 at 11:11:05AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler napsal(a): > > > > > I also did a test rebuild of all packages directly build-requiring > > > > > systemtap-sdt-devel and identified these packages that really need the > > > > > dtrace script: [...] > > > (The logistic challenge there will be side-tag rebuilding all those > > > after a systemtap subrpm split.) > > > > I don't understand why that would be necessary. Could you please explain why > > do you believe it would? > > OK, build-time dependency changes may not need the side tag but do > need a spec update to prevent a FTBFS at next build. > I was more worried about these races: If you first add BuildRequies and then the new package, there will be a window when the packages won't resolve build dependencies. If you first add the new package and then the BuildRequiers, then there will a window when the packages will fail to build.
This race can be solved by two separate changes in systemtap: First add the new package and run-require it from systemtap-sdt-devel. Then add the BuildRequires. And finally remove the run-time dependency from systemtap-sdt-devel. -- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
