On 08/25/2012 05:21 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Lennart Poettering wrote:
Start by filing bugs. Every feature owner should get the chance to first
fix things before you escalate it all the way to FESCO.
Filing bugs assumes the feature is fixable in the first place.
No, it doesn't. It provides a
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Start by filing bugs. Every feature owner should get the chance to first
> fix things before you escalate it all the way to FESCO.
Filing bugs assumes the feature is fixable in the first place. This one is
not.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
On Wed, 22.08.12 21:56, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> What is the procedure for asking FESCO to reconsider and revoke the
> broken tmp on tmpfs feature?
Start by filing bugs. Every feature owner should get the chance to first
fix things before you escalate it all the way to F
OK I have opened a ticket here:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/940
Others can add issues to that ticket.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:41:41PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> We can save this for the ticket. How do we go about getting
> it reverted? I'm assuming the starting point must be a
> FESCO ticket, but I cannot find anything in the feature process.
Open a ticket, describe issues not previo
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:25:08PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/8/22 Richard W.M. Jones :
> > broken tmp on tmpfs
>
> Could you give a reason why you think so?
We can save this for the ticket. How do we go about getting
it reverted? I'm assuming the starting point must be a
F
2012/8/22 DJ Delorie :
>
>> 2012/8/22 Richard W.M. Jones :
>> > broken tmp on tmpfs
>>
>> Could you give a reason why you think so?
>
> Can we not repeat the VERY long thread on why this is/isn't a broken feature?
Ah, ok, I'll read archived threads.
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedorap
> 2012/8/22 Richard W.M. Jones :
> > broken tmp on tmpfs
>
> Could you give a reason why you think so?
Can we not repeat the VERY long thread on why this is/isn't a broken feature?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
2012/8/22 Richard W.M. Jones :
> broken tmp on tmpfs
Could you give a reason why you think so?
>
> Rich.
>
> --
> Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
> libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
> bindings from many languag
What is the procedure for asking FESCO to reconsider and revoke the
broken tmp on tmpfs feature?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages. http://lib
10 matches
Mail list logo