On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 00:44 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's another look at F22 broken dependencies. Since last week, we're
> down to just a handful of packages. Thanks to everybody who's helped out
> with cleaning this up!
>
> The goal is to ship Fedora releases with repos where
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 14:02 -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Ken Dreyer
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Mamoru TASAKA <
> > mtas...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > By the way, I am not a maintainer of rubygem-rugged, either, and
> > > I don't use rubygem-rug
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Mamoru TASAKA
> wrote:
>> By the way, I am not a maintainer of rubygem-rugged, either, and
>> I don't use rubygem-rugged (currently). Anyway I want to know
>> how the current maintainer think of the current statu
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> By the way, I am not a maintainer of rubygem-rugged, either, and
> I don't use rubygem-rugged (currently). Anyway I want to know
> how the current maintainer think of the current status.
> If the current maintainer has no interest on this pack
Hi all,
Here's another look at F22 broken dependencies. Since last week, we're
down to just a handful of packages. Thanks to everybody who's helped out
with cleaning this up!
The goal is to ship Fedora releases with repos where all packages are
installable. On 2015-05-11, any packages that have r
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
>> > OK, here we go:
>> > · one patch to Gnatcoll for GCC 5
>> > · one patch to Matreshka for GCC 5
>> > · another patch to build Matreshka in spite of bug 11517
Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> > OK, here we go:
> > · one patch to Gnatcoll for GCC 5
> > · one patch to Matreshka for GCC 5
> > · another patch to build Matreshka in spite of bug 1151793
> > · one fix to GPRbuild that is needed before Matreshka c
2015-04-28 1:45 GMT+03:00 Kalev Lember :
> opensipsivaxer, peter
> python-sippypeter
Fixed both. Sorry for the delay.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fed
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> That built, update submitted, just gnatcoll and matreshka to go.
>
> OK, here we go:
> · one patch to Gnatcoll for GCC 5
> · one patch to Matreshka for GCC 5
> · another patch to build Matreshka in spite of bug 115179
Vít Ondruch wrote on 04/28/2015 11:52 PM:
Dne 28.4.2015 v 11:35 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
On 04/28/2015 10:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 28.4.2015 v 00:45 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
rubygem-rugged tdawson
I am not maintainer of this, but please do not remove this. Rugged was
broken by un
Peter Robinson wrote:
> That built, update submitted, just gnatcoll and matreshka to go.
OK, here we go:
· one patch to Gnatcoll for GCC 5
· one patch to Matreshka for GCC 5
· another patch to build Matreshka in spite of bug 1151793
· one fix to GPRbuild that is needed before Matreshka can be buil
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> I'm having issues with:
>> aws
>> gnatcoll
>> matreshka
>>
>> All of which have issues other than gnat 5. If you could have a look
>> at those and if you need help getting them built/submitted reach out
>> to me on e
Peter Robinson wrote:
> I'm having issues with:
> aws
> gnatcoll
> matreshka
>
> All of which have issues other than gnat 5. If you could have a look
> at those and if you need help getting them built/submitted reach out
> to me on email/IRC and I'll help get the the fixes built/landed. All
> the
On Tuesday, 28 April 2015 at 00:45, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In two weeks we will be entering the F22 Final Freeze. At that point,
> Fedora release engineering retires any packages that still have broken
> dependencies in the F22 tree.
>
> Based on today's Branched report [1], we still h
> leksah petersen, haskell-sig
Yes, this needs 8 new dependencies which I haven't
had time to post reviews for yet:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074907#c18
leksah is a Haskell IDE - I don't use it myself or
know many people who do, but if someone is willing
to he
>> > Kalev Lember wrote:
>> >>Package (co)maintainers
>> >>
>> >> aunit landgraf
>> >> aws landgraf
>> >> florist landgraf
>> >> gnatcolllandgraf
>> >> ma
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Björn Persson
>> wrote:
>> > Kalev Lember wrote:
>> >>Package (co)maintainers
>> >>
>> >> aunit
Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Björn Persson
> wrote:
> > Kalev Lember wrote:
> >>Package (co)maintainers
> >>
> >> aunit landgraf
> >> aws landgraf
> >> flor
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Kalev Lember wrote:
>> In two weeks we will be entering the F22 Final Freeze. At that point,
>> Fedora release engineering retires any packages that still have broken
>> dependencies in the F22 tree.
>
> Do you mean that they'll be retired
The broken oozie dep is only on the arm architecture. There were no
previous builds of oozie/pig/etc on arm prior to this change so there
were no F21 arm packages to fall back on. From my perspective the
change to enable building/running on arm is the cause of the issue for
oozie (but not pig
On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 12:58:01 PM Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 04/28/2015 12:51 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> > Kalev Lember wrote:
> >> In two weeks we will be entering the F22 Final Freeze. At that point,
> >> Fedora release engineering retires any packages that still have broken
> >> dependencies
Dne 28.4.2015 v 11:35 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
> On 04/28/2015 10:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 28.4.2015 v 00:45 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
>>> rubygem-rugged tdawson
>>>
>> I am not maintainer of this, but please do not remove this. Rugged was
>> broken by unannounced libgit2 update and t
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Robert Rati wrote:
>> oozie rrati, coolsvap, moceap
>
>
> This break occurred because of a very late change (April 22) to enable
> building/running the hadoop ecosystem on ARM. A dependency broke during
> that set of changes and will need to be l
oozie rrati, coolsvap, moceap
This break occurred because of a very late change (April 22) to enable
building/running the hadoop ecosystem on ARM. A dependency broke during
that set of changes and will need to be looked at. I don't think this
package should be retired if i
On 04/28/2015 12:51 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Kalev Lember wrote:
>> In two weeks we will be entering the F22 Final Freeze. At that point,
>> Fedora release engineering retires any packages that still have broken
>> dependencies in the F22 tree.
>
> Do you mean that they'll be retired entirely,
Kalev Lember wrote:
> In two weeks we will be entering the F22 Final Freeze. At that point,
> Fedora release engineering retires any packages that still have broken
> dependencies in the F22 tree.
Do you mean that they'll be retired entirely, or just removed from the
F22 branch?
>Package
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 00:45 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> aeskulapankursinha, mrceresa, susmit
I'm aware of this one. Was caused by an update in one of the libraries
aeskulap depends on. The problem is that aeskulap is quite an old
piece of software and hasn't been updated in a whil
On 04/28/2015 03:22 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kalev Lember wrote:
>> quarticurve-kwin-theme kkofler
>
> This one can just go away, it would need to be ported to KWin 5 and I
> probably won't be doing that port. (The KWin 4 version already renders worse
> than intended on all current 4.x release
On 04/28/2015 10:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 28.4.2015 v 00:45 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
>> rubygem-rugged tdawson
>>
>
> I am not maintainer of this, but please do not remove this. Rugged was
> broken by unannounced libgit2 update and there is still not official
> release fixing the co
Dne 28.4.2015 v 00:45 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
> rubygem-rugged tdawson
>
I am not maintainer of this, but please do not remove this. Rugged was
broken by unannounced libgit2 update and there is still not official
release fixing the compatibility. Removing this rubygem will mean just
more
Kalev Lember wrote:
> quarticurve-kwin-theme kkofler
This one can just go away, it would need to be ported to KWin 5 and I
probably won't be doing that port. (The KWin 4 version already renders worse
than intended on all current 4.x releases and I don't have much time to
spend on fixing that a
Hi all,
In two weeks we will be entering the F22 Final Freeze. At that point,
Fedora release engineering retires any packages that still have broken
dependencies in the F22 tree.
Based on today's Branched report [1], we still have a number of unfixed
packages with broken dependencies (package mai
32 matches
Mail list logo
