On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:58:59AM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> > On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>> New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
> >>> Haskell process-leksah library
> >>
> >> Is it not
On 01/29/2011 10:58 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>> On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
Haskell process-leksah library
>>>
>>> Is it not possible to try a lit
On 01/29/2011 09:56 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> That would probably be hard in general. I like to put in URLs to upstream
> announcements and/or change logs into the spec file change log.
>
I didn't see that reply to was just to Mr. Wolff. Here is the msg:
On 01/29/2011 09:56 AM, Bruno Wolf
On 01/29/2011 03:34 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>> New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
>>> Haskell process-leksah library
>>
>> Is it not possible to try a little harder to write a useful package
>> summary? Or for the
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>> New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
>>> Haskell process-leksah library
>>
>> Is it not possible to try a little harder to write a useful package
>> summary? Or
Oops. A mistake. Apologies. Would update the summary next time there is a
upstream update.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
> > Haskell process-leksah library
>
> Is it not possible to try a little harder to
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 09:34:33 -0500,
"Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote:
>
> Yes, please. Also, "new upstream version" as the only summary is not
> useful either. Can't the summary part be automated so the maintainer
> pushing the change can get the change logs as part of the update process?
That
On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
>> Haskell process-leksah library
>
> Is it not possible to try a little harder to write a useful package
> summary? Or for the package reviewer to take just a quick look and
> notice
>New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15
> Haskell process-leksah library
Is it not possible to try a little harder to write a useful package
summary? Or for the package reviewer to take just a quick look and
notice that a summary such as that is pretty much completely useless?