Re: rawhide report: 20110129 changes

2011-01-29 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:58:59AM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > > On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>> New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15 > >>>              Haskell process-leksah library > >> > >> Is it not

Re: rawhide report: 20110129 changes

2011-01-29 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
On 01/29/2011 10:58 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: >> On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15 Haskell process-leksah library >>> >>> Is it not possible to try a lit

Re: rawhide report: 20110129 changes

2011-01-29 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
On 01/29/2011 09:56 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > That would probably be hard in general. I like to put in URLs to upstream > announcements and/or change logs into the spec file change log. > I didn't see that reply to was just to Mr. Wolff. Here is the msg: On 01/29/2011 09:56 AM, Bruno Wolf

Re: rawhide report: 20110129 changes

2011-01-29 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/29/2011 03:34 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>> New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15 >>> Haskell process-leksah library >> >> Is it not possible to try a little harder to write a useful package >> summary? Or for the

Re: rawhide report: 20110129 changes

2011-01-29 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>> New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15 >>>              Haskell process-leksah library >> >> Is it not possible to try a little harder to write a useful package >> summary?  Or

Re: rawhide report: 20110129 changes

2011-01-29 Thread lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
Oops. A mistake. Apologies. Would update the summary next time there is a upstream update. On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15 > > Haskell process-leksah library > > Is it not possible to try a little harder to

Re: rawhide report: 20110129 changes

2011-01-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 09:34:33 -0500, "Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote: > > Yes, please. Also, "new upstream version" as the only summary is not > useful either. Can't the summary part be automated so the maintainer > pushing the change can get the change logs as part of the update process? That

Re: rawhide report: 20110129 changes

2011-01-29 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15 >> Haskell process-leksah library > > Is it not possible to try a little harder to write a useful package > summary? Or for the package reviewer to take just a quick look and > notice

Re: rawhide report: 20110129 changes

2011-01-29 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
>New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15 > Haskell process-leksah library Is it not possible to try a little harder to write a useful package summary? Or for the package reviewer to take just a quick look and notice that a summary such as that is pretty much completely useless?