On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > On 01/29/2011 09:21 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>> New package: ghc-process-leksah-1.0.1.4-2.fc15 >>> Haskell process-leksah library >> >> Is it not possible to try a little harder to write a useful package >> summary? Or for the package reviewer to take just a quick look and >> notice that a summary such as that is pretty much completely useless? >> >> - J< > > > Yes, please. Also, "new upstream version" as the only summary is not > useful either.
By summary, do you mean the %changelog entry? That entry represents the changelog of the specfile/srpm, which is different than the changelog of the software. While it is perfectly fine to write "new upstream version" to the %changelog of the specfile, the software changelog can (and perhaps should) go to the Notes section in bodhi. Orcan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
