On 05/22/2010 12:27 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 05:40:45PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> Unfortunately I couldn't find a really good way to differentiate
>>> between Debian from Ubuntu without using 'lsb_release -i'.
>>
>> /etc/issue contains that in
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 05:40:45PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Unfortunately I couldn't find a really good way to differentiate
> > between Debian from Ubuntu without using 'lsb_release -i'.
>
> /etc/issue contains that information. It says something like:
> Ubuntu 9
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Unfortunately I couldn't find a really good way to differentiate
> between Debian from Ubuntu without using 'lsb_release -i'.
/etc/issue contains that information. It says something like:
Ubuntu 9.04 \n \l
(blank line)
By the way, that also works on Fedora, my /etc/iss
Chen Lei wrote:
> I'd rather like to suggest of forbidden using of initscript in redhat-lsb
> for fedora packages. Despite of the depencencies issue, we can easily
> switch from /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions to /lib/lsb/init-functions and
> historically /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd and /usr/lib/lsb/rem
2010/5/22 Mattias Ellert
> fre 2010-05-21 klockan 19:55 -0500 skrev Matt Domsch:
> > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 08:40:12AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 07:44:48AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > > Rawhide Report wrote:
> > > > > mumble-1.2.2-8.fc14
> > > > > --
fre 2010-05-21 klockan 19:55 -0500 skrev Matt Domsch:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 08:40:12AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 07:44:48AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Rawhide Report wrote:
> > > > mumble-1.2.2-8.fc14
> > > > ---
> > > > * Sun May 16 2010
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 08:40:12AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 07:44:48AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Rawhide Report wrote:
> > > mumble-1.2.2-8.fc14
> > > ---
> > > * Sun May 16 2010 Andreas Osowski - 1.2.2-8
> > > - Rebuild for protobuf ABI chang
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:22:28AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > What happens if we want to run the /usr/bin/lsb_release command?
>
> Check /etc/redhat-release (which is a symlink to fedora-release, centos-
> release etc. on the relevant systems) instead?
Well, funnil
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> What happens if we want to run the /usr/bin/lsb_release command?
Check /etc/redhat-release (which is a symlink to fedora-release, centos-
release etc. on the relevant systems) instead?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 07:44:48AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rawhide Report wrote:
> > mumble-1.2.2-8.fc14
> > ---
> > * Sun May 16 2010 Andreas Osowski - 1.2.2-8
> > - Rebuild for protobuf ABI change
> > - Added redhat-lsb to the Requires for murmur
>
> As already noted by Rah
Rawhide Report wrote:
> mumble-1.2.2-8.fc14
> ---
> * Sun May 16 2010 Andreas Osowski - 1.2.2-8
> - Rebuild for protobuf ABI change
> - Added redhat-lsb to the Requires for murmur
As already noted by Rahul Sundaram when this change was made in CVS, redhat-
lsb is NOT a valid depen
On 17 May 2010 16:06, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> On 17 May 2010 19:08, Rawhide Report wrote:
>> Compose started at Mon May 17 08:15:09 UTC 2010
>>
>> Broken deps for i386
>> --
>>
>> plexus-containers-component-annotations-javadoc-1.0-0.1
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 20:36 +0530, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> >vfrnav-0.4-1.fc13.i686 requires libgps.so.18
> Anyone interested in looking for reasons for above breakages - fixing
> or pinging maintainers (whatever suits)? I will look into it in couple
> of days (coming weekend). Anyone else
On 17 May 2010 19:08, Rawhide Report wrote:
> Compose started at Mon May 17 08:15:09 UTC 2010
>
> Broken deps for i386
> --
> almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
> almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libeda
14 matches
Mail list logo
