On Fri, Nov 29 2024 at 08:09:20 PM -05:00:00, Neal Gompa
wrote:
Indeed. This stuff should work out of the box. It is unacceptable to
break it like this.
Looks like it's fixed by pkcs11-provider-0.6-2, which is a sabotage
update to turn off pkcs11-provider until the problem can be fixed
prope
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 11:27 AM Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 20 2024 at 04:03:27 PM +01:00:00, Clemens Lang
> wrote:
> > That was the case with openssl-pkcs11 (the package that contains the
> > OpenSSL PKCS#11 ENGINE) for years.
> > The use of PKCS#11 tokens is not very common. I don
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> * We do expect smartcards to work on immutable systems where
> installing extra packages is either inconvenient (Silverblue and
> Kinoite require overlays) or not possible (future Fedoras, hopefully)
Quite a distopian future you paint there!
My vision of the future does
On Wed, Nov 20 2024 at 04:03:27 PM +01:00:00, Clemens Lang
wrote:
That was the case with openssl-pkcs11 (the package that contains the
OpenSSL PKCS#11 ENGINE) for years.
The use of PKCS#11 tokens is not very common. I don’t think it’s
too much to ask to install an additional package if you want
Dear Davide,
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 1:07 PM Davide Caratti wrote:
> hello,
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:48 PM Dmitry Belyavskiy
> wrote:
> >
>
> [...]
> >> > The idea here was to auto-enable pkcs11-provider when it is
> installed, which still makes sense to me. The issue here I think is that
On 21/11/2024 13:06, Davide Caratti wrote:
yes. The problem is in md4_vector() [1], the legacy provider has a
non-NULL pointer and EVP_md4() fetches correctly. However, when
pkcs11-provider is installed,
EVP_DigestInit_ex() fails. I tried this patch [2] on upstream
wpa_supplicant, and it seem to
hello,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:48 PM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
>
[...]
>> > The idea here was to auto-enable pkcs11-provider when it is installed,
>> > which still makes sense to me. The issue here I think is that many people
>> > ended up with pkcs11-provider installed because of a recommen
On Wed, Nov 20 2024 at 11:09:05 AM +01:00:00, Clemens Lang
wrote:
The idea here was to auto-enable pkcs11-provider when it is
installed, which still makes sense to me. The issue here I think is
that many people ended up with pkcs11-provider installed because of a
recommendation. We should remo
Hi Michael,
> On 20. Nov 2024, at 15:52, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 20 2024 at 11:09:05 AM +01:00:00, Clemens Lang
> wrote:
>> The idea here was to auto-enable pkcs11-provider when it is installed, which
>> still makes sense to me. The issue here I think is that many people ende
hi,
(adding Vlad to the loop)
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 3:43 PM Davide Caratti wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> (Also, I tried reproducing locally on f41
> with NetworkManager-ci and << simwifi_ttls_mschapv2_eap >> test, but
> did not see any failure... @Arthur, can you share an example
> configuration for ed
hi,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:48 PM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
>
[...]
>> I'm trying a setup right now, to understand what's happening.
>> wpa_supplicant does not need pkcs11-provider *at the moment*, because
>> it uses engine API for pkcs11 (and that is going to be a problem in
>> the future for
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:38 AM Davide Caratti wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:09 AM Clemens Lang wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > On 19. Nov 2024, at 17:47, Arthur Bols wrote:
> > >
> > > A few days ago pkcs11-provider-0.5-3.fc41 update was pushed to Fedora
> 41. Unfortunately, this u
hi,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:09 AM Clemens Lang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On 19. Nov 2024, at 17:47, Arthur Bols wrote:
> >
> > A few days ago pkcs11-provider-0.5-3.fc41 update was pushed to Fedora 41.
> > Unfortunately, this update breaks eduroam and possibly many other
> > WPA2-Enterprise wifi
Hi,
> On 19. Nov 2024, at 17:47, Arthur Bols wrote:
>
> A few days ago pkcs11-provider-0.5-3.fc41 update was pushed to Fedora 41.
> Unfortunately, this update breaks eduroam and possibly many other
> WPA2-Enterprise wifi networks. There are multiple threads on Fedora
> Discussion, mainly [0],
14 matches
Mail list logo
