On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 11:54 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 25/05/17 11:46, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:17:21AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 10:36 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > fedora-review prints this in the ‘Issues’ section of the
>
On 25/05/17 11:46, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:17:21AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 10:36 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
fedora-review prints this in the ‘Issues’ section of the report:
‘- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel’
T
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:17:21AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 10:36 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > fedora-review prints this in the ‘Issues’ section of the report:
> >
> > ‘- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel’
> >
> > This has happened on a couple
On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 10:36 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> fedora-review prints this in the ‘Issues’ section of the report:
>
> ‘- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel’
>
> This has happened on a couple of reviews I have done recently. There
> is no other information given a
On 05/25/2017 11:36 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> fedora-review prints this in the ‘Issues’ section of the report:
>
> ‘- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel’
> So .. what does it mean?
My guess it's intended as an encouragement to build extensions for both
Python 2 *and* 3.