> On 25-05-2024 16:56, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Two more packages depend on it currently:
>
> $ fedrq wrsrc -Xs noopenh264
> ffmpeg-6.1.1-13.fc41.src
> gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.24.3-1.fc41.src
> qt6-qtwebengine-6.7.1-1.fc41.src
Ah, right. Qt6-webengine also uses Chromium's Blink and WebRTC.
T
On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 8:15 AM Byoungchan Lee via devel
wrote:
>
> While this is okay
> for Google, as they likely have a license agreement with other patent
> holders
>
While I do not think it has ever been officially
confirmed, it has been widely conjectured that
Google just pays the maxi
On Sun, May 26 2024 at 08:13:52 AM +00:00:00, Byoungchan Lee via devel
wrote:
From what I understand, even with noopenh264, Chromium and WebRTC's
codebase will still need modification to use Fedora's OpenH264 or
noopenh264 package.
What do you think?
I'm not familiar with Chromium or libwebrt
On Sun, May 26 2024 at 06:09:06 AM +00:00:00, Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
I see you have created noopenh264 just for wrapping openh264, would
it worth to use ffms2 (which wraps more codecs) instead?
The two things we care about are gstreamer1-plugin-openh264 and
mozilla-openh264, neither of
> On Sat, May 25 2024 at 12:55:05 PM +00:00:00, Byoungchan Lee via devel
> Yes!
Thanks for the confirmation, Michael!
> No. That's an example of what you no longer need to do now that
> noopenh264 is available in Fedora. Previously, dlopen() was required
> since you cannot build depend on the
Il 25/05/24 4:36 PM, Michael Catanzaro ha scritto:
>> 2. I came across jgrulich's pull request for the Chromium package
>> that proposes using dlopen with OpenH264 (
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/pull-request/29
>> ). I also
>> found a WebRTC changelist addressing a similar issue
On 25-05-2024 16:56, Leigh Scott wrote:
ffmpeg
Two more packages depend on it currently:
$ fedrq wrsrc -Xs noopenh264
ffmpeg-6.1.1-13.fc41.src
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.24.3-1.fc41.src
qt6-qtwebengine-6.7.1-1.fc41.src
-- Sandro
--
___
devel mai
ffmpeg
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ffmpeg/c/db2acb3681a85baed6bbc897cdac792d4b7d7c5f?branch=rawhide
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Con
On Sat, May 25 2024 at 12:55:05 PM +00:00:00, Byoungchan Lee via devel
wrote:
Is my understanding correct?
Yes!
That said, we're considering adding the Firefox plugin as well [1] so
we can finally make Firefox support OpenH264 without requiring user
intervention [2].
[1] https://gitlab
