Il 25/05/24 4:36 PM, Michael Catanzaro ha scritto:
>> 2. I came across jgrulich's pull request for the Chromium package
>> that proposes using dlopen with OpenH264 (
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/pull-request/29
>> ). I also
>> found a WebRTC changelist addressing a similar issue (
>> https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/349301
>> ). Are these
>> changes related to noopenh264?
>
> No. That's an example of what you no longer need to do now that
> noopenh264 is available in Fedora. Previously, dlopen() was required
> since you cannot build depend on the real openh264. Now, you can build
> depend on noopenh264 instead.
Doesn't ffms2 [1] provides similar functionality for wrapping codecs without
depending on ffmpeg directly?
I see you have created noopenh264 just for wrapping openh264, would it worth to
use ffms2 (which wraps more codecs) instead?
Mattia
[1] https://github.com/FFMS/ffms2
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
