Re: The state of Python 3.8 in Fedora 31

2019-07-03 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 17. 06. 19 21:03, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello, When I filed the Python 3.8 [change] for Fedora 31, we knew that the schedule would be tight. For that very reason, we have not yet started to build for Python 3.8 in a f31 side tag, but instead we've only been doing it in [copr] so far. The

Re: The state of Python 3.8 in Fedora 31

2019-06-17 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 17. 06. 19 22:12, Fabio Valentini wrote: - right after the F32 branching (2019-08-13 according to the [schedule]), we would start with the side tag builds This is probably a typo, you must mean "just after the F31 branching", right? Yes! F31 branching. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +4207779

Re: The state of Python 3.8 in Fedora 31

2019-06-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 9:52 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello, > > When I filed the Python 3.8 [change] for Fedora 31, we knew that the schedule > would be tight. > > For that very reason, we have not yet started to build for Python 3.8 in a f31 > side tag, but instead we've only been doing it in

Re: The state of Python 3.8 in Fedora 31

2019-06-17 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 17. 06. 19 21:41, Ben Cotton wrote: Thanks for bringing this up, Miro. On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 3:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: - there are ~200 build failures that block this, tracked on [bugzilla] I did a spot check of a few of the BZs and it looks like some of those build failures are u

Re: The state of Python 3.8 in Fedora 31

2019-06-17 Thread Ben Cotton
Thanks for bringing this up, Miro. On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 3:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > - there are ~200 build failures that block this, tracked on [bugzilla] I did a spot check of a few of the BZs and it looks like some of those build failures are unrelated to Python 3.8 but are due to othe