On 17. 06. 19 21:41, Ben Cotton wrote:
Thanks for bringing this up, Miro.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 3:03 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
- there are ~200 build failures that block this, tracked on [bugzilla]
I did a spot check of a few of the BZs and it looks like some of those
build failures are unrelated to Python 3.8 but are due to other
dependencies. Do you have a good sense of how many of the failures are
due to Python 3.8 and how many are coincidental?
I'd say around 20-30 % are coincidental.
Benefits:
- we would not be stressed by the immediate mass rebuild deadline
- we would not need to care about ABI incompatibilities between beta
releases,
because the last beta should be out when we start
Negatives:
- the users would get 3.8 as the main python3 about 6 months later, but they
already have Python 3.8 interpreter in Fedora to develop on
From my perspective, it's worth waiting until F32 to avoid the
potential for important changes in a key package. I don't see anything
in the upstream feature set[1] that would justify the risk we'd be
subjecting ourselves (particularly the QA team) to.
[1] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0569/#features-for-3-8
Neither do we.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
