Re: My apologies... [Was: Re: The maintainership of webkitgtk]

2010-08-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:56:02 +0200 Martin Sourada wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 23:03 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: > > Hi, all. > > > > As the primary maintainer of Fedora's WebKitGTK+ stack, allow me > > first to apologize for my lack of diligence here. Let me simply say > > that I know now tha

Re: My apologies... [Was: Re: The maintainership of webkitgtk]

2010-08-23 Thread Martin Sourada
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 23:03 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: > Hi, all. > > As the primary maintainer of Fedora's WebKitGTK+ stack, allow me first > to apologize for my lack of diligence here. Let me simply say that I > know now that almost maxing-out one's unit counts for a semester, > double-majoring

Re: My apologies... [Was: Re: The maintainership of webkitgtk]

2010-08-03 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/04/2010 11:33 AM, Peter Gordon wrote: > Alas, the usage of ABRT over the past few months or so has significantly > increased the count of bugs reported against WebKitGTK/Midori, and > continued assistance in squashing/triaging these would be greatly > appreciated! I think it would be useful

My apologies... [Was: Re: The maintainership of webkitgtk]

2010-08-03 Thread Peter Gordon
Hi, all. As the primary maintainer of Fedora's WebKitGTK+ stack, allow me first to apologize for my lack of diligence here. Let me simply say that I know now that almost maxing-out one's unit counts for a semester, double-majoring, and severe bouts of procrastination without cause are three things

Re: The maintainership of webkitgtk

2010-08-03 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Tuesday, August 03, 2010 12:01:37 pm Martin Sourada wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 09:43 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 09:24 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've been wondering what's up with webkitgtk maintainership. It's > > > pretty important gnome

Re: The maintainership of webkitgtk

2010-08-03 Thread Martin Sourada
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 09:43 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 09:24 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been wondering what's up with webkitgtk maintainership. It's pretty > > important gnome desktop component but it looks rather neglected. Last > > update on stab

Re: The maintainership of webkitgtk

2010-08-03 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 09:24 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > Hi, > > I've been wondering what's up with webkitgtk maintainership. It's pretty > important gnome desktop component but it looks rather neglected. Last > update on stable branches of fedora was done by rahul who even isn't in > the commit

Re: The maintainership of webkitgtk

2010-08-02 Thread Martin Sourada
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 09:28 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > What we really need > is someone who would take care about all WebKit implementations in Fedora > and it's nearly full time job :-) Or even better - someone realizes that > shipping X nearly standalone webkits on Y toolkits is just a madn

Re: The maintainership of webkitgtk

2010-08-02 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Sunday, August 01, 2010 09:24:28 am Martin Sourada wrote: > Hi, > > I've been wondering what's up with webkitgtk maintainership. It's pretty > important gnome desktop component but it looks rather neglected. Last > update on stable branches of fedora was done by rahul who even isn't in > the co

Re: The maintainership of webkitgtk

2010-08-01 Thread Ben Boeckel
Martin Sourada wrote: > Hi, > > I've been wondering what's up with webkitgtk maintainership. It's pretty > important gnome desktop component but it looks rather neglected. Last > update on stable branches of fedora was done by rahul who even isn't in > the commit acl's on webkitgtk and since then

Re: The maintainership of webkitgtk

2010-08-01 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 09:24:28 +0200 Martin Sourada wrote: > Hi, > > I've been wondering what's up with webkitgtk maintainership. It's > pretty important gnome desktop component but it looks rather > neglected. Last update on stable branches of fedora was done by rahul > who even isn't in the comm