On 11/02/17 02:08 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Justin Forbes wrote:
>> * AGREED: Allow the update, encourage everyone to work through the
>> process better next time (7,0,0) (jforbes, 16:51:10)
>
> The context:
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1675
> #1675 Libglvnd update breaking F25
> is m
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Justin Forbes wrote:
>> There are really no more technical road blocks in this update. There are
>> several advantages to having it. To deny it at this point would be
>> entirely punitive. To me, that did not seem warranted at this time, thou
Justin Forbes wrote:
> There are really no more technical road blocks in this update. There are
> several advantages to having it. To deny it at this point would be
> entirely punitive. To me, that did not seem warranted at this time, though
> if it is a continuing problem, it may well be the next
On Feb 10, 2017 7:09 PM, "Kevin Kofler" wrote:
Justin Forbes wrote:
> * AGREED: Allow the update, encourage everyone to work through the
> process better next time (7,0,0) (jforbes, 16:51:10)
The context:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1675
#1675 Libglvnd update breaking F25
is missing the
Justin Forbes wrote:
> * AGREED: Allow the update, encourage everyone to work through the
> process better next time (7,0,0) (jforbes, 16:51:10)
The context:
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1675
#1675 Libglvnd update breaking F25
is missing there.
This is essentially giving the GNOME develop
On Feb 10, 2017 16:27, "Chris Murphy" wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Chris
Nope. The monitoring works with dmeventd, but I'm not sure how
sophisticated the monitoring is or what messaging method it uses
(dbus?) or what monitors it (udisksd or storaged?). But again, the
loss of email no
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Justin Forbes said:
>> * AGREED: Discussion on anaconda LVM change is delayed until 2-17
>> provided open questions get answered (+1:6,0:0,-1:0) (jforbes,
>> 17:24:33)
>
> So, not sure if this is in the "open ques
Once upon a time, Justin Forbes said:
> * AGREED: Discussion on anaconda LVM change is delayed until 2-17
> provided open questions get answered (+1:6,0:0,-1:0) (jforbes,
> 17:24:33)
So, not sure if this is in the "open questions", but on the mailing list
I brought up the fact that MD
