On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 04:27:25PM +, Globe Trotter wrote:
> FWIW, here is another example where this caused problems:
> https://stackoverflow.com/q/44834208/479426
>
> --
> Respectfully, the above package is not from R, but R-forge. If
> contributors who are not part of the R ecosystem do not
From: Matthew Miller
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: R 3.4 update
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 11:38:00AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> First, I appreciate the work that goes into maintaining the R ecosystem. But
>
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 11:38:00AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> First, I appreciate the work that goes into maintaining the R ecosystem. But
> there is now a problem that I don't think people would allow in other
> languages. Namely, the recently pushed R-3.4 update breaks the whole world.
> Some
On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 4:09:54 PM EDT Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 3:47:42 PM EDT Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 17:08 +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 25 June 2017 16.38.00 WEST Steve Grubb wrote:
> > >
> > > > For example, when I run RStudio,
On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 16:09 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 3:47:42 PM EDT Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 17:08 +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 25 June 2017 16.38.00 WEST Steve Grubb wrote:
> > >
> > > > For example, when I run RStudio, I ge
On Tuesday, June 27, 2017 3:47:42 PM EDT Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 17:08 +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> > On Sunday, 25 June 2017 16.38.00 WEST Steve Grubb wrote:
> >
> > > For example, when I run RStudio, I get:
> > >
> > > R graphics engine version 12 is not supported by
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 20:28 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> IOW, F26 can have 3.4 just fine
> since its not shipped.
Well, it's not quite that clear cut. Even if we ignore the Final freeze
which just kicked in (a significant version update would not be a great
candidate for a freeze exception, in mos
On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 08:28:15PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> We don't do incompatible changes for python within a Fedora version release.
> Major changes should be tied to an OS release. IOW, F26 can have 3.4 just
> fine
> since its not shipped. F25 has already shipped and rebuilding EVERYTHIN
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 17:08 +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 June 2017 16.38.00 WEST Steve Grubb wrote:
> > For example, when I run RStudio, I get:
> >
> > R graphics engine version 12 is not supported by this version of RStudio.
> > The Plots tab will be disabled until a newer vers
On Sunday, June 25, 2017 12:08:29 PM EDT José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 June 2017 16.38.00 WEST Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> > For example, when I run RStudio, I get:
> >
> > R graphics engine version 12 is not supported by this version of RStudio.
> > The Plots tab will be disabled until a n
On Sunday, 25 June 2017 16.38.00 WEST Steve Grubb wrote:
> For example, when I run RStudio, I get:
>
> R graphics engine version 12 is not supported by this version of RStudio.
> The Plots tab will be disabled until a newer version of RStudio is
> installed.
You need to update Rstudio to a newer
I just need one more review...
> R-GenomicAlignments : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457453
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 06/01/2017 12:00 PM, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> I can take a few a these. If you could review these two python packages
> for me:
All done. Thank you for helping me (and for making such clean packages).
~tom
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
tor 2017-06-01 klockan 10:39 -0400 skrev Tom Callaway:
> Background: R recently released 3.4.0, which introduced changes that
> required all "compiled" R modules to be rebuilt against it. I've been
> working over the last week or so to do this, and at the same time, bring
> them to the latest revis
Il 03/01/2015 15:44, Antonio Trande ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/03/2015 04:00 PM, gil wrote:
Il 03/01/2015 15.03, Antonio Trande ha scritto: On 01/03/2015 01:33
PM, punto...@libero.it wrote:
i think xorg-x11-drv-nouveau regards gil
You must check if the nV
Il 03/01/2015 15.03, Antonio Trande ha scritto:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/03/2015 01:33 PM, punto...@libero.it wrote:
>> i think xorg-x11-drv-nouveau regards gil
> You must check if the nVidia video driver is loaded and if it is,
> check why it does not work proper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/03/2015 01:33 PM, punto...@libero.it wrote:
> i think xorg-x11-drv-nouveau regards gil
You must check if the nVidia video driver is loaded and if it is,
check why it does not work properly. See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_Xorg_pro
Il 05/11/2013 18:59, punto...@libero.it ha scritto:
hi
see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NetBeans_7.3 (should be update)
problem(s):
- latest NB releases use some libraries available in java8 e.g.
https://github.com/furosys/nashorn
Nashorn for Java 7 https://bitbucket.org/ramonza/
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 10/22/2012 09:39 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> > sorry I mistakenly deleted the R discussion from my inbox. Here is what
>
> Based on your errors, I'm wondering if you're using the R packages in
> Fedora, or if you've built R from source. I
Here's what I get:
$ sudo yum install R-java
[sudo] password for :
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
adobe-linux-i386 | 951 B 00:00
google-chrome| 951 B 00:00
rpmfusion-free-updates
Please use the Fedora users list for user questions:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (P
On 10/22/2012 09:39 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> sorry I mistakenly deleted the R discussion from my inbox. Here is what
Based on your errors, I'm wondering if you're using the R packages in
Fedora, or if you've built R from source. I did a fresh install of R:
(yum install R R-java), then ran inst
On 10/22/2012 07:52 PM, Michael Weiner wrote:
> Did you try re-installing rJava within R (i.e.
> install.packages("rJava")) ?? I wasnt aware these contrib packages
> were available through yum
rJava is included as a subpackage of R. (yum install R-java)
~tom
==
Fedora Project
--
devel mailing l
On 10/22/2012 09:39 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> checking Java support in R... present:
> interpreter : '/bin/java'
> archiver: '/bin/jar'
> compiler: '/bin/javac'
> header prep.: '/bin/javah'
> cpp flags : '-I/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.6/jre/../include
> -I/usr/lib/jvm/java-1
another attempt
> > install.packages("rJava")
Error: unexpected '>' in ">"
> Installing package(s) into
‘/home/richard/R/i686-redhat-linux-gnu-library/2.15’
Error: unexpected symbol in "Installing package"
> (as ‘lib’ is unspecified)
Error: unexpected input in "(as �"
> trying URL 'http://cran.sta
Did you try re-installing rJava within R (i.e.
install.packages("rJava")) ?? I wasnt aware these contrib packages
were available through yum
Regards
Michael Weiner
--
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Richard Vickery
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
>>
>> On 10/21/201
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 10/21/2012 11:24 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> > Hi Gang,
> >
> > For some strange reason, something has gone wrong with R, the statistics
> > program. R doesn't know where to find rJava and perhaps the other
> > programs to run JGR. so I
On 10/21/2012 11:24 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> Hi Gang,
>
> For some strange reason, something has gone wrong with R, the statistics
> program. R doesn't know where to find rJava and perhaps the other
> programs to run JGR. so I thought I might try uninstalling - and
> re-installing - it, but y
On 04/10/2012 07:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:10:46 +0200
Alec Leamas wrote:
I've moderated them... sorry it took me a few minutes to notice. ;)
kevin
Hey, no need to apologize, it was actually fixed in a couple of minutes.
Just a break in the everyday routines. Takes an I
On 04/10/2012 10:17 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 10:12 AM, Digimer wrote:
>> Can someone remove this user from the list until they fix their email
>> program?
>
> From the headers, it looks like bastion.fedoraproject.org repeatedly
> sending it out. Everything up to that has the same Rec
On 04/10/2012 10:12 AM, Digimer wrote:
> Can someone remove this user from the list until they fix their email
> program?
From the headers, it looks like bastion.fedoraproject.org repeatedly
sending it out. Everything up to that has the same Received header.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:10:46 +0200
Alec Leamas wrote:
> On 04/10/2012 07:01 PM, pinto.e...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Messaggio originale
> > Da: Horst H. von Brand
> > Inviato: 10/04/2012, 16:31
> > A: Development discussions related to Fedora; Kevin Kofler
> > Oggetto: Re: Primary Architectu
Il 10/04/2012 19:01, pinto.e...@gmail.com ha scritto:
> Messaggio originale
> Da: Horst H. von Brand
> Inviato: 10/04/2012, 16:31
> A: Development discussions related to Fedora; Kevin Kofler
> Oggetto: Re: Primary Architectures: Another Proposal (RFC)
>
>
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Josh Bo
Can someone remove this user from the list until they fix their email
program?
On 04/10/2012 01:01 PM, pinto.e...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Messaggio originale
> Da: Horst H. von Brand
> Inviato: 10/04/2012, 16:31
> A: Development discussions related to Fedora; Kevin Kofler
> Oggetto: Re: Pr
On 04/10/2012 07:01 PM, pinto.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Messaggio originale
Da: Horst H. von Brand
Inviato: 10/04/2012, 16:31
A: Development discussions related to Fedora; Kevin Kofler
Oggetto: Re: Primary Architectures: Another Proposal (RFC)
12, and counting... time for post-graduate cou
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 06:25 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 07/04/2011 04:37 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:31:18AM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >> Hi folks,
> >>
> >> Thanks all for the input. I didn't realize the subject was *this*
> >> controversial. I did find the ot
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I suspect Kevin's concern is that someone stuffs some hidden shell
> code into ./configure which isn't in configure.ac. (Of the "send all
> your private ssh keys to remote host" variety).
>
> This concern has some legitimacy. But OTOH someone could stuff the
> same co
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 11:09:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kevin Kofler writes:
> > FWIW, I think we should actually run autoreconf -i -f in ALL specfiles as a
> > matter of policy, even if we aren't changing anything,
>
> To what end? If you need to change configure.ac, that's one thing ...
>
On 07/04/2011 04:37 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:31:18AM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Thanks all for the input. I didn't realize the subject was *this*
>> controversial. I did find the other discussion thread[1] which was aimed
>> at completing the draft I
Kevin Kofler writes:
> FWIW, I think we should actually run autoreconf -i -f in ALL specfiles as a
> matter of policy, even if we aren't changing anything,
To what end? If you need to change configure.ac, that's one thing ...
but if you don't, you're just uselessly exposing yourself to risks.
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:31:18AM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Thanks all for the input. I didn't realize the subject was *this*
> controversial. I did find the other discussion thread[1] which was aimed
> at completing the draft I had linked to, and as you'll notice it was
> inconcl
Hi folks,
Thanks all for the input. I didn't realize the subject was *this*
controversial. I did find the other discussion thread[1] which was aimed
at completing the draft I had linked to, and as you'll notice it was
inconclusive. I was hoping something had changed (the thread dates back
to 2008)
On 07/03/2011 10:34 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> FWIW, I think we should actually run autoreconf -i -f in ALL specfiles as a
> matter of policy, even if we aren't changing anything, the same way we
> require Java JARs to be rebuilt from source.
please no!
curently most of the fedora packages can be
pinto.e...@gmail.com wrote:
> First of all Sorry for not quoting. It is just for telling an opinion from
> someone that know the autofu well, almost. For me this idea of patching
> generated autofu is wrong. if i have to patching the GNU build system
> there is a reason of course. Which reason is
44 matches
Mail list logo
