On 02/04/15 10:34 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
Thanks. Hadn't occurred to me the + operator here was a template as
I'd never had to deal with basic_string. Still a bit puzzled as
cplusplus.com says string is an instantiation of basic_string while
cppreference.com says it's a typedef (which I guess do
On 1 April 2015 at 16:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 01/04/15 15:16 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> Do you mind clarifying? I thought should provide that
>> http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/string/string/operator+/ or is that
>> what fno-implicit-templates is turning off?
>
>
> Of course string
On 01/04/15 15:16 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
Do you mind clarifying? I thought should provide that
http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/string/string/operator+/ or is that
what fno-implicit-templates is turning off?
Of course string provides it, but it's a template, so it needs to be
instantiated.
On 1 April 2015 at 14:32, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 28/03/15 16:45 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>>
>> 2015-03-28 16:06 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>> :
>>>
>>> Is this expected to not compile with -fno-implicit-templates?
>>>
>>> ---%<---
>>> $ cat test.cc
>>> #inclu
On 28/03/15 16:45 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
2015-03-28 16:06 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
:
Is this expected to not compile with -fno-implicit-templates?
---%<---
$ cat test.cc
#include
std::string test(int i)
{
std::string t;
std::string s = "(";
t =
2015-03-28 16:06 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
:
> Is this expected to not compile with -fno-implicit-templates?
>
> ---%<---
> $ cat test.cc
> #include
> std::string test(int i)
> {
> std::string t;
> std::string s = "(";
> t = "";
> for (int r = i; r; r>>=1) {
>
