On 02/04/15 10:34 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
Thanks. Hadn't occurred to me the + operator here was a template as I'd never had to deal with basic_string. Still a bit puzzled as cplusplus.com says string is an instantiation of basic_string while cppreference.com says it's a typedef (which I guess doesn't count as explicit instantiation).
cplusplus.com is notoriously inaccurate. It probably means string is a specialization of basic_string. This is going very off-topic for this list. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
