Re: Question about error: inlining failed in call to ‘always_inline’

On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 6:32 PM Orion Poplawski wrote: > simdjson is failing to build with GCC 14 on x86_64: > > /usr/bin/cmake -S/home/tkloczko/rpmbuild/BUILD/simdjson-3.6.4 > -B/home/tkloczko/rpmbuild/BUILD/simdjson-3.6.4/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu > --check-build-system CMakeFiles/Makefile.cmake 0

Re: Question about conditional BuildRequires lines

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 5:55 PM Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > On 14/02/2024 15:48, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:21:38PM +, Tom Hughes wrote: > >> On 14/02/2024 14:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> > >>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rapidjson/pull-request/7

Re: Question about conditional BuildRequires lines

On 14/02/2024 15:48, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:21:38PM +, Tom Hughes wrote: On 14/02/2024 14:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rapidjson/pull-request/7 I don't think what Tom is saying there is correct, or is it? The answer is th

Re: Question about conditional BuildRequires lines

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:21:38PM +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 14/02/2024 14:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > >https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rapidjson/pull-request/7 > > > >I don't think what Tom is saying there is correct, or is it? > > The answer is that I'm wrong about it breaking thin

Re: Question about conditional BuildRequires lines

On 14/02/2024 14:54, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rapidjson/pull-request/7 I don't think what Tom is saying there is correct, or is it? The answer is that I'm wrong about it breaking things, because koji uses the unpacked spec file to install dependencies not t

Re: question about dnf5 upgrade output

Am Do., 7. Sept. 2023 um 14:02 Uhr schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek : > > I'm testing the upgrade to F39, and I see the following: > > Installing group/module packages: > tlwg-waree-fontsnoarch 0.7.3-9.fc39 fedora > 250.3 KiB >replacing thai-scalable-fonts-comm

Re: [Question] how to make Fedora linux os ?

On Thu, 13 Jul 2023 at 21:45, Miao, Jun wrote: > Hi Guys, > > > > AFAIK, the Yocto Project is an open source collaboration project that > provides tools, templates, and methods to help developers create custom > Linux-based systems for embedded devices. > > > > My confusion is that: > >1. wha

Re: [Question] how to make Fedora linux os ?

On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 02:58 +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > This is the wrong question, kinda. There is no detailed step-by-step > > process. The process for creating a compose is, more or less, "push the > > magic COMPOSE NOW" button. (Okay, there's a *bit* more t

Re: [Question] how to make Fedora linux os ?

Adam Williamson wrote: > This is the wrong question, kinda. There is no detailed step-by-step > process. The process for creating a compose is, more or less, "push the > magic COMPOSE NOW" button. (Okay, there's a *bit* more to it than that, > but not a lot). The SOP for it is > https://docs.pagure

Re: [Question] how to make Fedora linux os ?

On Sun, 2023-07-16 at 15:24 -0400, Christopher wrote: > > > > There is more than one tool in use. The main build tool is Koji, but it > > depends on other underlying tools such as Mock, DNF, RPM, etc. Also keep in > > mind that in Fedora, all binaries are natively compiled, not cross-compiled > >

Re: [Question] how to make Fedora linux os ?

Am 16.07.23 um 21:24 schrieb Christopher: On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 7:30 AM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Miao, Jun wrote: Hi Guys, First of all, we are not all guys. (I happen to be one though.) I would advise not to get too picky about this. The term "guys" isn't necessarily gender-specif

Re: [Question] how to make Fedora linux os ?

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 7:30 AM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Miao, Jun wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > First of all, we are not all guys. (I happen to be one though.) I would advise not to get too picky about this. The term "guys" isn't necessarily gender-specific. In its plural form, it has basical

Re: [Question] how to make Fedora linux os ?

Miao, Jun wrote: > Hi Guys, First of all, we are not all guys. (I happen to be one though.) > AFAIK, the Yocto Project is an open source collaboration project that > provides tools, templates, and methods to help developers create custom > Linux-based systems for embedded devices. > > My confusi

Re: Question about git signed tags

Thanks to all respondents - an interesting discussion. I think I'm now equipped to respond to upstream. Bob On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 08:15, Björn Persson wrote: > Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 29/11/2022 17:33, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > > One of reasons being that it's (at least slightly

Re: Question about git signed tags

Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 29/11/2022 17:33, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > One of reasons being that it's (at least slightly) easier to > > notice a change to the public key / keyring when it's in > > dist-git versus the lookaside cache > > It depends on public key format. Armored (ASCII f

Re: Question about git signed tags

On 29/11/2022 20:57, Neal Gompa wrote: If they're ASCII armored format, then store them in Git, by all means. Yep. The example[1] stores the keys in binary format. Missing --armor option. [1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_exceptions -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zait

Re: Question about git signed tags

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 2:50 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 29/11/2022 17:33, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > One of reasons being that it's (at least slightly) easier to > > notice a change to the public key / keyring when it's in > > dist-git versus the lookaside cache > > It depends on pub

Re: Question about git signed tags

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022, at 3:24 AM, Bob Hepple wrote: > Here's a question from one of my upstream devels. Not sure I understand > exactly what he's asking but I thought I'd post here in the hope that > someone can enlighten him (and me!). > > "... Arch supports signed git tags. I'm hoping Fedora

Re: Question about git signed tags

On 29/11/2022 17:33, Todd Zullinger wrote: One of reasons being that it's (at least slightly) easier to notice a change to the public key / keyring when it's in dist-git versus the lookaside cache It depends on public key format. Armored (ASCII format) vs. binary keys. Storing binaries in Git

Re: Question about git signed tags

Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 29/11/2022 09:24, Bob Hepple wrote: >> "... Arch supports signed git tags. I'm hoping Fedora does too. > > On Fedora you must upload source tarball, its signature and public key to > the Fedora look-aside cache A minor expansion on that; the public key / upstr

Re: Question about git signed tags

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 3:24 AM Bob Hepple wrote: > > Here's a question from one of my upstream devels. Not sure I understand > exactly what he's asking but I thought I'd post here in the hope that someone > can enlighten him (and me!). > > "... Arch supports signed git tags. I'm hoping Fedora d

Re: Question about git signed tags

On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 at 07:29, Björn Persson wrote: > > As to why the builders lack Internet access, I wasn't around when that > was decided but it helps ensure that the source RPM packages actually > contain the source code. > > During the early days of packaging, there were a set of packages whi

Re: Question about git signed tags

Bob Hepple wrote: > If we _do_ support "signed git tags" how do we code for it in the spec > file? As the builders lack Internet access, they can't pull directly from the upstream Git repository. To verify a signed Git tag during the build, it would be necessary to package up the whole Git reposit

Re: Question about git signed tags

Adding to what Vitaly has said: The other question is where you get those signatures from. If upstream does not sign tarballs any more then there is nothing to check, sadly. In a source-git based workflow, or if you roll your own using rpkg or such, you have the upstream source available so tha

Re: Question about git signed tags

On 29/11/2022 09:24, Bob Hepple wrote: "... Arch supports signed git tags. I'm hoping Fedora does too. On Fedora you must upload source tarball, its signature and public key to the Fedora look-aside cache, because builders have no network access for security reasons. -- Sincerely, Vitaly

Re: Question on creating system users/groups at install in spec file

That did it - thank you very much! On 30/04/2022 23:26, Paweł Marciniak wrote: I think you need %pre -n the same for %preun %post %postun or all systemd macros will not work. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Question on creating system users/groups at install in spec file

I think you need %pre -n the same for %preun %post %postun or all systemd macros will not work. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://d

Re: Question about Fedora Package Naming

Hello Remi, Thank you very much for your reply! I am a PHP user for years. I like PHP very much except for breaking compatibility :P How do you think about adding something similar to the following sentences to naming scheme of PHP packaging guidelines[1]. I understand the preference is to updat

Re: Question about Fedora Package Naming

Le 19/02/2022 à 13:58, Hirotaka Wakabayashi via devel a écrit : Hello, I have a question about Fedora Package Naming. php-guzzlehttp-guzzle's version is 5.3.4, which is already EOL version by upstream. The latest version is 7.4.1. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-guzzlehttp-guzzle

Re: Question about Fedora Package Naming

Hello Neal. Thank you for reply! I will firstly ask to update the main package. I think it's ideal if Fedora users can always use the latest packages and they don't use inactive(EOL?) packages naturally. I don't completely understand the Fedora infra, but I am wondering if a mass rebuild can sk

Re: Question about Fedora Package Naming

On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 7:59 AM Hirotaka Wakabayashi via devel wrote: > > Hello, I have a question about Fedora Package Naming. > > php-guzzlehttp-guzzle's version is 5.3.4, which is already EOL version by > upstream. The latest version is 7.4.1. > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-guzzlehtt

Re: question about review process excemptions for Python 3

Am 25.01.22 um 21:22 schrieb Miro Hrončok: If I assume correctlty that both python-augeas and python-boto3 are in RHEL 7, yes. this exception applies: """ > The package exists in both Fedora and RHEL, but the packager wants to ship it in EPEL under an alternative name (as required by EPEL

Re: question about review process excemptions for Python 3

On 25. 01. 22 21:05, Felix Schwarz wrote: Hi, (I sent this to epel-devel but did not get any reply there so maybe fedora-devel is a better place for this question even though this is about EPEL packages?) the packaging guidelines have a few excemptions for the package review process [1]. I'

Re: Question on adding a new package to fedora

> So far there has been no action on the bug to get it reviewed. > Does it usually take a while to get the review started? Well, the thing is - there isn't really anyone obliged to review package submissions. Almost every single review is done by volunteers, using their free time. > Do I need to

Re: Question regarding debugging with gdb

JT wrote on 2021/12/28 23:22: I didn't find the BT that helpful... Although it's possible I've completely forgotten everything I previously knew about gdb and I need to relearn everything from the ground up. I'm perplexed by the BT because the first of the steps it shows on the way to the segfaul

Re: Question regarding debugging with gdb

I didn't find the BT that helpful... Although it's possible I've completely forgotten everything I previously knew about gdb and I need to relearn everything from the ground up. I'm perplexed by the BT because the first of the steps it shows on the way to the segfault is for main.cpp:79. > (gdb) b

Re: Question regarding debugging with gdb

Is the backtrace not helpful in figuring out where to set up breakpoints? As in, “gdb foo”, then “run”, wait for the crash, and type “bt”? The darktable development documentation suggests[1] the following to log useful backtraces: |$ gdb darktable ... crash dt here ... (gdb) set paginatio

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:15:24PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > shown that the answer is "probably not, actually". And it's _really > hard_ for me to go to Red Hat and say "hey, um, I know you're paying > for this Gitlab contract we can use, but can you please do this huge > project, with ongoing

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

* Daniel P. Berrangé: > We do much the same in libvirt > > https://github.com/libvirt/libvirt-python/pull/4#issuecomment-662443409 > > FWIW, there's no need to write a bot to achieve this - there's a > a github action: > > https://github.com/apps/repo-lockdown > > you can simply enable for you

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 11:40:43AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:20:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > Note the GNOME auto-closer provides a comment telling the user that the > > primary repo is on gitlab and pointing them to where it is. Logging > > > How hard

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Wed, Dec 1 2021 at 11:40:43 AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: How hard would it be to actually automatically mirror the PR? It actually does that, but if you don't follow up on GitLab it's just going to get closed, since PRs from new contributors are never good enough to merge the first tim

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:20:53PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > Note the GNOME auto-closer provides a comment telling the user that the > primary repo is on gitlab and pointing them to where it is. Logging How hard would it be to actually automatically mirror the PR? -- Matthew Miller F

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29 2021 at 04:22:42 PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Well that would be what I was missing. I guess this should be much less controversial, then, if it's OK for people to just continue using dist-git forever and completely ignore src-git? Nobody is ever required to use something

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:12:29PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 01. 12. 21 0:37, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 1 2021 at 12:27:35 AM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman > > wrote: > > > How do people using this setup prevent people from submitting PR and > > > issues to the Github mirror where th

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On 01. 12. 21 0:37, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Wed, Dec 1 2021 at 12:27:35 AM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: How do people using this setup prevent people from submitting PR and issues to the Github mirror where they cannot be applied/fixed? For GNOME we just set up a bot that autocloses ever

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On 01. 12. 21 13:03, Hunor Csomortáni wrote: Packit developer and Source-git SIG member here, joining two days late to this thread. One important thing to call out: the source-git workflow is not officially adopted by the Fedora Community. All the work that is ongoing in this space is experiment

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 7:09 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you > support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on > gitlab.com, which a proprietary software git forge? > > Fedora Council has already effectively stated tha

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Wed, Dec 1 2021 at 12:27:35 AM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: How do people using this setup prevent people from submitting PR and issues to the Github mirror where they cannot be applied/fixed? For GNOME we just set up a bot that autocloses every PR. ___

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 12:27:35AM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Michel Alexandre Salim [30/11/2021 15:22] : > > > > At the risk of straying off-topic, an approach I really like (which is > > in the spirit of Git being distributed) is to use an open source forge > > primarily, with GitHub only

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

* Michel Alexandre Salim [30/11/2021 15:22] : > > At the risk of straying off-topic, an approach I really like (which is > in the spirit of Git being distributed) is to use an open source forge > primarily, with GitHub only as backup. How do people using this setup prevent people from submitting P

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:58:09PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > Whenever this topic has come up, I've see lots of this, except people don't > say the first part out loud: "Of course _I_ use GitHub for most of my stuff, > because of all of the advantages — but Fedora, Fedora should never." We > ca

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > Also bear in mind you can't actually forbid source git repositories > on any platforms. > > Some maintainers already use source git repositories, they just don't > happen to be blessed by the Fedora project. If what Fedora offers > is kneecapped, the maintainers can ign

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > It is more than just sysadmin time involved though. One of the most > compelling parts of GitLab is its CI framework and the free runners it > provides projects. Any kind of CI support should be considered nice-to-have and not a required feature of a git forge. You can

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > The second issue has been the general rule that Fedora systems run by > infrastructure use Fedora Linux or RHEL. Packaging up all the ruby > gems and various services needed is a large task and usually falls on > someone like Neal Gompa to try a stab at it. Even if it

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

Matthew Miller wrote: > Nope! The Packit Service bot works just like a human packager and syncs > back changes other packagers have made. I do not see how that can work for things like conditionally-applied patches. Unless you just drop them into src-git as patches, which entirely defeats the po

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you > support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on > gitlab.com, which a proprietary software git forge? IMHO (as a non-candidate), it is sad that this question has to be asked at all: Fedora

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 04:22:42PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Mon, Nov 29 2021 at 04:42:18 PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: Nope! The Packit Service bot works just like a human packager and syncs back changes other packagers have made. Well that would be what I was missing. I guess th

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:25:29PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Mon, Nov 29 2021 at 03:15:24 PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: source-git is intended to be distributed and close to upstreams. Interesting. Why? What you and David are both saying seems so weird to me, I suddenly wonder if

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:06:13PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you support > allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on gitlab.com, which a > proprietary software git forge? > > Fedora Council has already effectively st

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:25:29PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29 2021 at 03:15:24 PM -0500, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > source-git is intended to be > > distributed and close to upstreams. > > Interesting. Why? What you and David are both saying seems so weird to me, I > sudden

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:15:24PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:06:13PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you > > support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on > > gitlab.com, which a propri

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 04:22:42PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Well that would be what I was missing. I guess this should be much > less controversial, then, if it's OK for people to just continue > using dist-git forever and completely ignore src-git? Nobody is ever > required to use somethi

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

I echo your views and agree with you completely. FOSS implementations should be used whenever available. - Ahmed Almeleh (Candidate for FESCo, the youngest of them.) On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 19:59, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 7:06 PM Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > > > Hi, I h

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29 2021 at 04:42:18 PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: Nope! The Packit Service bot works just like a human packager and syncs back changes other packagers have made. Well that would be what I was missing. I guess this should be much less controversial, then, if it's OK for people t

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 16:26, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > Could we set up open-source Gitlab and run that? Well, history has > shown that the answer is "probably not, actually". > > I don't believe it. If GNOME and KDE and freedesktop.org and Debian and > Purism can all do it, I'm pretty sure

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:25:29PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > src-git is exclusively used for downstream Fedora packaging, so I > don't expect upstreams to be interested at all, unless upstream > developers are also the Fedora packagers, right? I'm also assuming So, we do have a lot of sof

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29 2021 at 03:15:24 PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: source-git is intended to be distributed and close to upstreams. Interesting. Why? What you and David are both saying seems so weird to me, I suddenly wonder if I am seriously misunderstanding something, because I know you're re

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:53:54PM -0500, David Cantrell wrote: > coordinate their work. Even if you spend your time working solely > upstream, src-git still ultimately goes through dist-git via PackIt as > would existing package maintenance. dist-git therefore is the > authoritative source of wh

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:58:58PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > interview, but it doesn't hurt to ask. > I actually briefly mentioned this topic in my last interview for > FESCo, one year ago (last paragraph, the "open question"): > https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fesco-election-intervie

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:06:13PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on gitlab.com, which a proprietary software git forge? Fedora Council has already effectively stated t

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 8:58 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 7:06 PM Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > > > Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you > > support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on > > gitlab.com, which a proprietary so

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:06:13PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you > support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on > gitlab.com, which a proprietary software git forge? I am not one of these candidates, but I think

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 7:06 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you > support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on > gitlab.com, which a proprietary software git forge? > > Fedora Council has already effectively stated tha

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 7:05 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > I mean... that would have been a good way to make sure everyone at least > provided some answer, but I don't think we have (or should have) any rule > against asking FESCo or Council people questions at other times. I think asking FESCo or

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

> It's too late for the questionnaire, yes, but... too late to ask??? > > I mean... that would have been a good way to make sure everyone at > least > provided some answer, but I don't think we have (or should have) any > rule > against asking FESCo or Council people questions at other times. > >

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:19:53AM -0800, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > One should have proposed such a question during the period when such > questions were being vetted. It is too late now that the questions asked > were the decided, the responses made, and the election has begun. Perhaps > you should

Re: Question for election candidates: do you support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on a proprietary software git forge?

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021, 10:06 Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, I have a question for the FESCo and Council candidates: do you > support allowing Fedora src-git repositories to be hosted on > gitlab.com, which a proprietary software git forge? > One should have proposed such a question during the per

Re: Question about toolbox purpose/usage

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:35 AM Sergio Belkin wrote: > Hi, > I've been playing a bit with toolbox, what is it intended for? > > I understand that was intended primarily for immutable OS. But > documentation says that it can be used on the Workstation edition too. > AFAIK it's only useful if you d

Re: Question about toolbox purpose/usage

Since we're talking about toolbox, is there a way to get rid of or change the hexagon in the prompt after you enter a toolbox? My google-fu failed me on that one. That being said, I'm having way too much fun making custom toolbox images for the devs at my workplace. It's a pretty big hit here. H

Re: Question about toolbox purpose/usage

Sergio Belkin kirjoitti 29.11.2021 klo 3.32: Hi, I've been playing a bit with toolbox, what is it intended for? I understand that was intended primarily for immutable OS. But documentation says that it can be used on the Workstation edition too. AFAIK it's only useful if you don't want to mess u

Re: question on fedorapeople space

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 08:58:06AM +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 04:35:20 +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > > Thank you, your answer makes sense and clarifies to me what is on the > > instructions page. If I were editing the page, I would make sure that it > > says somewh

Re: question on fedorapeople space

On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 04:35:20 +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > Thank you, your answer makes sense and clarifies to me what is on the > instructions page. If I were editing the page, I would make sure that it says > somewhere that we need to ssh in and then create the directories and > per

Re: question on fedorapeople space

Thank you, your answer makes sense and clarifies to me what is on the instructions page. If I were editing the page, I would make sure that it says somewhere that we need to ssh in and then create the directories and permissions. the first part is not mentioned anywhere on that page. Thanks aga

Re: question on fedorapeople space

I am guessing that the public_html/ directory in your home directory does not exist or does not have the read and/or execute bits set for all users. Try: $ ssh aa...@fedorapeople.org 'mkdir -p public_html; chmod 0755 public_html' to make sure the directory exists with the correct permissions.

Re: Question about retired python-oslo-messaging, python-oslo-middleware and python-oslo-service

Hello Alfredo, Thanks you for your kind reply! I will check the RDO's packages and submit re-reviews. Best Regards,Hirotaka Wakabayashi On Monday, July 26, 2021, 5:45:17 PM GMT+9, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 6:24 AM Hirotaka Wakabayashi wrote: Hell

Re: Question about retired python-oslo-messaging, python-oslo-middleware and python-oslo-service

Hi, On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 6:24 AM Hirotaka Wakabayashi wrote: > Hello Alfredo, > > I would like to maintain the following retired packages that you have > formerly > maintained[1]. Upstream of each package is alive. I would be happy if you > could tell me if you know additional issues with the

Re: Question on how to handle an upgrade case (vim-syntastic)

Thanks for the quick response!  I've submitted a new build to rawhide that fixes this. Marty On 7/7/21 12:46 PM, Paweł Marciniak wrote: but do I also need to obsolete older versions of the vim-syntastic-rnc subpackage? Yes, you have to. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-gu

Re: Question on how to handle an upgrade case (vim-syntastic)

PS. rnc subpackage is still built. You should remove this line "#%add_subpackage -n rnc rnv" or replace with this line "#%%add_subpackage -n rnc rnv" Please note the additional percent sign. You should also remove unnecessary files. e.g. "rm -r syntax_checkers/rnc" And of course add obsoletes (se

Re: Question on how to handle an upgrade case (vim-syntastic)

> but do I also need to obsolete older versions of the > vim-syntastic-rnc subpackage? Yes, you have to. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo

Re: Question on how to handle an upgrade case (vim-syntastic)

On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 12:42 PM Martin Jackson wrote: > > Hello, > > I use and like vim-syntastic, so I took it from the orphan list. > > There is an open bug on it that led to its retirement, that the rnc > subpackage fails to install because rnv is no longer available. > > It's straightforward e

Re: Question about Provides and Obsoletes

On 5/28/21 10:39 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 9:32 AM Steven A. Falco mailto:stevenfa...@gmail.com>> wrote: I understand that we should put "Obsoletes" statements in a spec file when a package changes its name, so the package with the new name can replace the package with

Re: Question about Provides and Obsoletes

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 9:32 AM Steven A. Falco wrote: > I understand that we should put "Obsoletes" statements in a spec file when > a package changes its name, so the package with the new name can replace > the package with the old name. > > But how long should the Obsoletes statements be left

Re: Question related to systemd-oomd

El jue, 27 may 2021 a las 19:45, Anita Zhang () escribió: > "Scope" from that Wiki is referring to the scope section of the proposal ( > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnableSystemdOomd#Scope). As of > systemd 248 the missing features are landed so > ManagedOOMMemoryPressureLimit= is now a

Re: Question related to systemd-oomd

"Scope" from that Wiki is referring to the scope section of the proposal (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnableSystemdOomd#Scope). As of systemd 248 the missing features are landed so ManagedOOMMemoryPressureLimit= is now available (this was named something else in 247).

Re: question was: What do we think about always autoreconfing? was: Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal))

On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 09:27 +0200, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:30 PM David Cantrell > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:26:24AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > >Hijacking this thread originally about > > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 > > >

Re: Question on mass rebuild impact

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 08:05:45AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Is it possible to still do updates in side-tags for rawhide during the mass > rebuild? What are the ramifications if any for this? Should be fine. If your packages aready were (re)built by mass rebuild, and you build them in a s

Re: Question on mass rebuild impact

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:48 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 28. 01. 21 16:05, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > Is it possible to still do updates in side-tags for rawhide during the mass > > rebuild? What are the ramifications if any for this? > > I've just did so let's see. > > https://bodhi.fedoraproj

Re: Question on mass rebuild impact

On 28. 01. 21 16:05, Orion Poplawski wrote: Is it possible to still do updates in side-tags for rawhide during the mass rebuild?  What are the ramifications if any for this? I've just did so let's see. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-675d1948a8 Note that the packages alrea

Re: question about ELN builds of glusterfs and ceph?

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020, 9:16 AM Kaleb Keithley wrote: > I confess I'm a bit ignorant about how the ELN builds are going to be > used. Especially the ELN builds of glusterfs and ceph. > > That aside— > > Red Hat ships GlusterFS and Ceph (RHGS and RHCS respectively) as products, > and generally speaki

Re: Question about mass rebuilds

On Mon, 25 Nov 2019, Till Maas wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 10:33:54AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote: Yet according to koji, there is no build for fc31: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=avr-libc I'm not saying that anything is wrong - I'm just curious as to why the

  1   2   3   4   >