On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 01:51:13PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 02/26/2015 11:22 AM, Haïkel wrote:
> > Hi Rahul,
> >
> > I wish you all the best in your new job :)
> >
> > I suggest that you add the python-sig as co-maintainers for your
> > python packages.
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.o
On 02/26/2015 11:22 AM, Haïkel wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
>
> I wish you all the best in your new job :)
>
> I suggest that you add the python-sig as co-maintainers for your
> python packages.
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/group::python-sig/
>
> Regards,
> H.
>
I'd like to do this f
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 03:17:23PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Such as the above statement is written I see these goals there.
> WRT enthought, they're very interested in getting their software packaged
> for individual distributions but don't have any manpower or inhouse
> knowledge on how
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 03:11:15PM +, José Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:36:35 David Malcolm wrote:
> > How about this:
> > "A SIG for people who are interested in Python on Fedora. This includes
> > packaging and optimizing the various Python 2 and Python 3 runtimes
> > (CPython
On Wednesday 17 March 2010 19:36:35 David Malcolm wrote:
> How about this:
> "A SIG for people who are interested in Python on Fedora. This includes
> packaging and optimizing the various Python 2 and Python 3 runtimes
> (CPython, Jython), packaging libraries and applications, setting and
> improvi
I think the issue of Python distutils/setuptools is important. I posted a
note to the Python Distutils SIG asking if there was any way I could do an
RPN package (using bdist_rpm) with results going to my usual rpmbuild
directory tree instead of being placed in the same directory tree as the
source
