Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> On 18 December 2014 at 17:57, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
>> 2014-12-18 20:20 GMT+03:00 Tim Waugh :
>>
>>> I could package it in its own sub-package, ghostscript-x11, but that
>>> might be a bit surprising to people who expect 'ghostscript' to have an
>>> x11alpha driver.
On 18 December 2014 at 17:57, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> 2014-12-18 20:20 GMT+03:00 Tim Waugh :
>
>> I could package it in its own sub-package, ghostscript-x11, but that
>> might be a bit surprising to people who expect 'ghostscript' to have an
>> x11alpha driver.
>>
>> Alternatively I could move eve
2014-12-18 20:20 GMT+03:00 Tim Waugh :
> I could package it in its own sub-package, ghostscript-x11, but that
> might be a bit surprising to people who expect 'ghostscript' to have an
> x11alpha driver.
>
> Alternatively I could move everything else from ghostscript to a new
> sub-package ghostscr
