2014-12-18 20:20 GMT+03:00 Tim Waugh <twa...@redhat.com>: > I could package it in its own sub-package, ghostscript-x11, but that > might be a bit surprising to people who expect 'ghostscript' to have an > x11alpha driver. > > Alternatively I could move everything else from ghostscript to a new > sub-package ghostscript-base, and have 'ghostscript' (i.e. just the > X11.so plugin) require ghostscript-base (i.e. everything else).
The latter approach (ghostscript depending on *-core and *-x11/gui) is better. it won't break any installations while providing enough flexibility for the new ones. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
