Hi Fabio,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 02:32:13PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> - mcrouter-0:0.41.0.20220221-1.fc35 >
> mcrouter-0:0.41.0-8.20211222git90d63a3.fc36
> Snapshot versioning scheme format was changed on F35 only (!),
> resulting in an NVR downgrade (?).
>
Huh, somehow it got left off
htt
Il 28/03/22 18:14, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 6:06 PM Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
>> Il 28/03/22 16:19, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
>>> Note that this list only includes *Version* downgrades.
>>>
>>> There's a few dozen more packages that are downgraded because of lo
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 6:06 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
>
> Il 28/03/22 16:19, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
> >
> > Note that this list only includes *Version* downgrades.
> >
> > There's a few dozen more packages that are downgraded because of lower
> > *Release* values, but I didn't yet hav
Il 28/03/22 16:19, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
>
> Note that this list only includes *Version* downgrades.
>
> There's a few dozen more packages that are downgraded because of lower
> *Release* values, but I didn't yet have time to go through all those
> (some are probably caused by additional rpma
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 9:19 AM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 5:51 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Yes, it's that time of the year again. Looks like it's not *that* bad
> > > this tim
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 5:51 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Yes, it's that time of the year again. Looks like it's not *that* bad
> > this time round, but the fact that this keeps happening probably means
> > some of ou
V Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:56:18AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III napsal(a):
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 21:06:44 +0100,
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 8:57 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> > I don't really understand what you're saying here. Unless your update
> > is blocked by somet
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 21:06:44 +0100,
Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 8:57 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I don't really understand what you're saying here. Unless your update
is blocked by something else that is not "stable" yet *and* you don't
(or cannot) use a buildroot overrid
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 8:57 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:58:17 -0700,
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> >On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 18:52 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> >>
> >> > If it was the latter, I couldn't find it in your message. Sorry.
> >> It's actually quite simple: T
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:58:17 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 18:52 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> If it was the latter, I couldn't find it in your message. Sorry.
It's actually quite simple: There are dozens if not hundreds of unpushed
updates pending due to the releas
On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 18:52 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
> > If it was the latter, I couldn't find it in your message. Sorry.
> It's actually quite simple: There are dozens if not hundreds of unpushed
> updates pending due to the release freeze, which will be released at the
> very moment the
Am 24.03.22 um 18:07 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 5:58 PM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
(...)
Oh noes, the list isn't really getting shorter ...
It's Fedora's old release management flaw ;)
As usual at these times of the release cycle, Fedora 36 is in deep
freeze, i.e. packag
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 5:58 PM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
(...)
> > Oh noes, the list isn't really getting shorter ...
>
> It's Fedora's old release management flaw ;)
>
> As usual at these times of the release cycle, Fedora 36 is in deep
> freeze, i.e. package updates are not getting pushed, which
Am 24.03.22 um 17:51 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi all,
Yes, it's that time of the year again. Looks like it's not *that* bad
this time round, but the fact that this keeps happening probably means
some of our processes are broken ... (or,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Yes, it's that time of the year again. Looks like it's not *that* bad
> this time round, but the fact that this keeps happening probably means
> some of our processes are broken ... (or, since some usernames are
> attached to m
Fabio Valentini wrote on 2022/03/18 22:32:
Probably caused by F36FTBFS issues:
===
- cantor-0:21.12.2-1.fc35 > cantor-0:21.12.1-2.fc36
Version 21.12.2 seems to have failed to build on f36+, but was submitted to f35.
- julia-0:1.7.2-1.fc35 > julia-0:1.7.0.0-1.f
Hau idatzi du Fabio Valentini (decatho...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak
(2022 mar. 18, or. (14:33)):
>
> Hi all,
>
> - gojq-0:0.12.7-1.fc35 > gojq-0:0.12.6-2.fc36
> Version 0.12.7 was built for F35+, but no bodhi update for F36 was submitted.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6c128bd
Dne 18. 03. 22 v 14:32 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
- The "I'm going to build this update for F34, F35, F37/Rawhide,
EPEL7, EPEL8, and EPEL9, but never wonder about the missing number
between F35 and F37" cases are almost funny. :)
This is missing "git pull" or "git fetch" after branching. So i
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 14:32:13 +0100
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> "Forgotten" F36 updates:
>
>
...
>
> - perl-Net-DNS-0:1.33-1.fc35 > perl-Net-DNS-0:1.32-3.fc36
> Version 1.33 was built on F34, F35, F37 / Rawhide, but not F36.
Fixed:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FE
19 matches
Mail list logo
