Re: Orphaning few packages

2016-06-01 Thread gil
take also this one regards .g Il 01/06/2016 13:37, Michal Srb ha scritto: rpms/rngom -- Java library for parsing RELAX NG grammars ( master f24 f23 f22 ) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaning few packages

2016-06-01 Thread Michal Srb
On 06/01/2016 02:30 PM, gil wrote: Il 01/06/2016 13:37, Michal Srb ha scritto: Hello, Due to lack of time, I am orphaning following packages: hi take these Thank you gil ;) Michal rpms/spring-ldap -- Java library for simplifying LDAP operations ( master f24 f23 f22 ) rpms/sprin

Re: Orphaning few packages

2016-06-01 Thread gil
Il 01/06/2016 13:37, Michal Srb ha scritto: Hello, Due to lack of time, I am orphaning following packages: hi take these rpms/spring-ldap -- Java library for simplifying LDAP operations ( master f24 f23 f22 ) rpms/springframework -- Spring Java Application Framework ( master f24 f23

Re: Fixing proxy support in Fedora (was Re: Orphaning few packages)

2013-07-26 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 16:49 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > > But it's actually relatively simple to hack around that for now with a > > NM dispatcher script. Having libproxy-pacrunner available is the > > important missing piece of the puzzle for now. Sorry for delayed response. Please don't d

Re: Fixing proxy support in Fedora (was Re: Orphaning few packages)

2013-07-18 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2013/7/18 David Woodhouse > On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 01:19 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:55 PM, David Woodhouse > wrote: > > > On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 12:08 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > >> libproxy taken. > > > > > > I'm also very interested in libproxy. Would you

Re: Fixing proxy support in Fedora (was Re: Orphaning few packages)

2013-07-18 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 01:19 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:55 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 12:08 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > >> libproxy taken. > > > > I'm also very interested in libproxy. Would you mind if I comaintain it? > > Please reque

Re: Fixing proxy support in Fedora (was Re: Orphaning few packages)

2013-06-06 Thread Dan Winship
On 06/06/2013 04:41 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > I think the existing libproxy API is sane enough. It could be better. But pacrunner's D-Bus API looks fine (mostly because by using D-Bus you get asynchrony and cancellability for free). It would be nice if it exposed the "Method" from CreateProxyC

Re: Fixing proxy support in Fedora (was Re: Orphaning few packages)

2013-06-06 Thread Colin Walters
Hi David, On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 11:55 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 12:08 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > libproxy taken. > > I'm also very interested in libproxy. Great! Can you help out with testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970282#c4 ? -- devel

Re: Fixing proxy support in Fedora (was Re: Orphaning few packages)

2013-06-06 Thread Christopher Meng
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:55 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 12:08 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: >> libproxy taken. > > I'm also very interested in libproxy. Would you mind if I comaintain it? Please request the commit privilege if you want to maintain it. That's all... -- dev

Re: Fixing proxy support in Fedora (was Re: Orphaning few packages)

2013-06-06 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 11:55:08AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > - *EVERY* application just asks "what proxy should I use for this >URL" by default, unless it's explicitly configured otherwise. I feel your pain, but making every application depend on an "overcomplex" C++ Javascript interpre