2013/7/18 David Woodhouse <dw...@infradead.org> > On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 01:19 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:55 PM, David Woodhouse <dw...@infradead.org> > wrote: > > > On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 12:08 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > >> libproxy taken. > > > > > > I'm also very interested in libproxy. Would you mind if I comaintain > it? > > > > Please request the commit privilege if you want to maintain it. That's > all... > > I've just pushed a 0.4.11-5 build to rawhide with support for PacRunner > (which is also now in Fedora now). > > So there's a libproxy-pacrunner subpackage, like all the other > subpackages, that will do nothing but query PacRunner. > > I'm separately working on fixing NetworkManager to actually *tell* > PacRunner the current proxy configuration, as derived from the network > connection (either automatically or via manual per-connection settings). > > But it's actually relatively simple to hack around that for now with a > NM dispatcher script. Having libproxy-pacrunner available is the > important missing piece of the puzzle for now. >
Should the dispatcher script be provided by the libproxy-pacrunner sub-package ? Or NM ? There is probably a need to have theses sub-packages properly installed by default ? (with the appropriate plugins). Does having particular package set by default should be a feature ? Nicolas (kwizart)
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
