Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 14:06 +, Sergey Avseyev wrote: > mypaint is not retired you can take the onwership -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org F

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

Is it too late to restore maintenance of mypaint? I've just fixed all issues, and only about to push last patch, but cannot do it unfortunately anymore. -- Sergey Avseyev El lun., 7 ene. 2019 a las 7:59, Miro Hrončok () escribió: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when th

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 6:11 PM Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 23:49:17 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Request package ownership via releng issues: > > https://pagure.io/releng/issues > > How? Click "New Issue", fill out "package_unorphan" or "package_unretirement" template, su

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 23:49:17 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Request package ownership via releng issues: > https://pagure.io/releng/issues How? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedora

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

It BuildRequires gcc, which BuildRequires dblatex, which BuildRequires python-which. I'm rebundling python-which in dblatex, so that should go away. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowi

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 9:44 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 02:41 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > openvswitch aconole, chrisw, orphan, 0 weeks ago > > > tgraf, tredaell > > > > This one is a dependen

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

Original Message - >> From: "Steven A. Falco" >> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 9:39:17 AM >> Subject: Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week) >> >> On 9/9/19 6:06 PM, Elliott Sale

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

10, 2019 9:39:17 AM > Subject: Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week) > > On 9/9/19 6:06 PM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 18:02, David Sommerseth wrote: > >> > >> On 09/09/2019 23:49, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >>> T

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

On 9/9/19 6:06 PM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 18:02, David Sommerseth wrote: >> >> On 09/09/2019 23:49, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they >>> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

On Tuesday, 10 September 2019 at 06:47, Raphael Groner wrote: > > My package requires libxslt. > > You're obviously not alone with this issue. The better question is > *why* the package as a commonly used library got orphaned, propably > silently without warning (at least I can not find any announ

libxslt (was: Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week))

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 07:43:49AM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > W dniu 10.09.2019 o 06:47, Raphael Groner pisze: > > Hi, > > > >> My package requires libxslt. > > > > You're obviously not alone with this issue. The better question is *why* > > the package as a commonly used library got orphan

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

W dniu 10.09.2019 o 06:47, Raphael Groner pisze: > Hi, > >> My package requires libxslt. > > You're obviously not alone with this issue. The better question is *why* the > package as a commonly used library got orphaned, propably silently without > warning (at least I can not find any announcem

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

Hi, > My package requires libxslt. You're obviously not alone with this issue. The better question is *why* the package as a commonly used library got orphaned, propably silently without warning (at least I can not find any announcement, officially). Regards Raphael ___

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 11:49:17PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fed

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

I filed an issue offering to take this and a few others. Sent from ProtonMail mobile \ Original Message On Sep 9, 2019, 7:31 PM, < mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:49 PM, Miro Hrončok > <[mhron...@redhat.com][mhroncok_redhat.com]> > wrote: > > li

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 02:41 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > openvswitch aconole, chrisw, orphan, 0 weeks ago > > tgraf, tredaell > > This one is a dependency of NetworkManager, so surely it should not go away. > (Or is the

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

Miro Hrončok wrote: > openvswitch aconole, chrisw, orphan, 0 weeks ago > tgraf, tredaell This one is a dependency of NetworkManager, so surely it should not go away. (Or is the plan to drop support for it from NM?) So can either one of the ex

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:49 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: libxslt orphan, veillard 0 weeks ago Looks pretty important, any takers? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an ema

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

Elliott Sales de Andrade writes: > On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 18:02, David Sommerseth wrote: >> >> On 09/09/2019 23:49, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they >> > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for >> > sure >>

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

On 9/9/19 4:49 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: libxslt orphan, veillard 0 weeks ago This is a big one... @Daniel, can you take it over as primary maintainer? Thanks, Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscr

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 18:02, David Sommerseth wrote: > > On 09/09/2019 23:49, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > > that the package should be retired, please do

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (~400 during this week)

On 09/09/2019 23:49, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/H

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

> Sorry, but I'm afraid I don't quite get this. Could you please rephrase? > The script uses source repos to fetch build-dependencies. Thanks. That answers my question. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019, 19:20 Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for > sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraproject.

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On 09. 04. 19 0:03, Raphael Groner wrote: Hopefully, it's sufficient to rebuild in rawhide only. It is. No idea why the original try to unbundle failed and your script cares about other as just looking into really generated dependencies of binary rpm instead of analysis done in spec file.

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

Hi Miro, volumeicon should be fixed in rawhide. It turns out that the BuildRequires line wasn't needed at all in volumeicon.spec because upstream bundles partly its own copy of the needed functions with code obviously copied from keybinder. Therefore I dropped this BR and added a new Provides

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On 02. 04. 19 8:41, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Miro, > > Could you please also send a list of retired packages after you pull the > trigger? The information was included in my e-mail (I guess a bit hidden): >> Packages already retired today: >>SimplyHTML aether-connector-okhttp antlr3 apache-commo

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

Miro, Could you please also send a list of retired packages after you pull the trigger? Thx Vít Dne 01. 04. 19 v 23:17 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know > for sure >

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On 18. 03. 19 22:58, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: The actual effect of this is that I'm going to disable Java bindings for all the affected packages. Java loses, Fedora loses. Everybody looses :( -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok __

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 10:34:23AM +0100, Jakub Jelen wrote: > On Fri, 2019-03-15 at 19:36 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 23:48:49 +0100, you wrote: > > > > > * Richard W.M. Jones [15/03/2019 20:23] : > > > > Is Java being dropped from the distro? > > > > > > Yes, that's w

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 05:35, Jakub Jelen wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-03-15 at 19:36 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 23:48:49 +0100, you wrote: > > > > > * Richard W.M. Jones [15/03/2019 20:23] : > > > > Is Java being dropped from the distro? > > > > > > Yes, that's what we were

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Fri, 2019-03-15 at 19:36 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 23:48:49 +0100, you wrote: > > > * Richard W.M. Jones [15/03/2019 20:23] : > > > Is Java being dropped from the distro? > > > > Yes, that's what we were warned about months ago. > > Don't think so. > > Nothing has

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 23:48:49 +0100, you wrote: >* Richard W.M. Jones [15/03/2019 20:23] : >> Is Java being dropped from the distro? > >Yes, that's what we were warned about months ago. Don't think so. Nothing has been said about dropping Java, and if anything the OpenJDK packagers have been mor

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

* Richard W.M. Jones [15/03/2019 20:23] : > > These are very important packages. What do we have to do here? I'm going to repeat this until it sinks in... If you (this is the generic you, not you specifically) want these packages to be in the distribution, you need to step up and ask for maintai

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 12:40:00PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:38:47AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> rjones: apache-ivy, maven-jar-plugin, maven-javadoc-plugin, gradle, > >> xmvn, plexus-utils > > > > I'm unclear what if anything I coul

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:38:47AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> rjones: apache-ivy, maven-jar-plugin, maven-javadoc-plugin, gradle, >> xmvn, plexus-utils > > I'm unclear what if anything I could do (apart from maintaining loads > of Java packages which isn't going to h

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:38:47AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > rjones: apache-ivy, maven-jar-plugin, maven-javadoc-plugin, gradle, > xmvn, plexus-utils I'm unclear what if anything I could do (apart from maintaining loads of Java packages which isn't going to happen). Is the email saying that so

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 06:53, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > You can build Java apps as modules, yes. > If we remove the mentioned packages from rawhide, it will be the only way to > build Java packages. How are the Java applications that come with C (JNI) extensions handled in the modules model? How do

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On 13. 03. 19 18:05, Christopher wrote: On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:07 AM Randy Barlow wrote: On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 18:39 -0400, Christopher wrote: Well, the packager experience I'm expecting in 3 weeks is: "almost all of my dependencies and BuildRequires are gone; I can't build anything". How

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 6:23 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 7:21 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Can you give us a minimal set of packages that is required to make sure > > libreoffice etc. aren't caught up in the mass retirement? > > The minimal package set is the contents

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:07 AM Randy Barlow wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 18:39 -0400, Christopher wrote: > > Well, the packager experience I'm expecting in 3 weeks is: "almost > > all > > of my dependencies and BuildRequires are gone; I can't build > > anything". > > How much worse could it

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 18:39 -0400, Christopher wrote: > Well, the packager experience I'm expecting in 3 weeks is: "almost > all > of my dependencies and BuildRequires are gone; I can't build > anything". > How much worse could it get than that? Fair. I don't think we anticipated the large migrati

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:49 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Mikolaj Izdebski: > > >> As far as I understand it, under the Koji model, one of the tags wins, > >> and which one determines whether you get the Python 2 subpackage or the > >> Python 3 subpackage. You cannot get both. You will need t

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

* Mikolaj Izdebski: >> As far as I understand it, under the Koji model, one of the tags wins, >> and which one determines whether you get the Python 2 subpackage or the >> Python 3 subpackage. You cannot get both. You will need two or more >> buildroots for that. > > That used to be the case, bu

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 11:59 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Mikolaj Izdebski: > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 4:42 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > >> Alternative sum up: > >> * People (not just Mikolaj) started using modules, while Koji cannot use > >> modular repos. > > > > Incorrect. Koji (the softw

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

* Mikolaj Izdebski: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 4:42 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> Alternative sum up: >> * People (not just Mikolaj) started using modules, while Koji cannot use >> modular repos. > > Incorrect. Koji (the software) *can* use modular repos. I know of more > than one installation of K

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 7:21 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > Can you give us a minimal set of packages that is required to make sure > libreoffice etc. aren't caught up in the mass retirement? The minimal package set is the contents of javapackages-tools module, stream 201801. There are about 185 pa

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

Hi, On 3/13/19 9:45 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: * Hans de Goede [13/03/2019 08:51] : A solution for this needs to be found and be in place *before* dropping these packages not the otherway around. We've known the solution for months, now. If you (this is the generic you, not you specifically

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 21:24 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 3:11 PM Jakub Jelen > wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 13:43 +0200, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > Hmm, > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/MQMRQVENBLDRS

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

* Hans de Goede [13/03/2019 08:51] : > > A solution for this needs to be found and be in place *before* dropping > these packages not the otherway around. We've known the solution for months, now. If you (this is the generic you, not you specifically) want these packages to be in the distribution

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

Hi, On 12-03-19 11:38, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019, 07:42 Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On ke, 13 maalis 2019, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >On Tue, Mar 12, 2019, 22:37 Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:17 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 at 12:02, Miko

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On ke, 13 maalis 2019, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Tue, Mar 12, 2019, 22:37 Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:17 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 at 12:02, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:49 AM Jakub Jelen wrote: > >

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019, 22:37 Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:17 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 at 12:02, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:49 AM Jakub Jelen > wrote: > > > > > > > > Is there already a way t

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 6:03 PM Randy Barlow wrote: > As Miro said in another post, it's not that FESCo doesn't want to use > modules in Koji, it's that we want to make sure that the packager > experience is as good as it was pre-modularity, and in particular that > packagers can build locally as

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 22:18 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > It's Fedora developers (represented by > elected body of FESCo) that don't want to use modules in Fedoras' > Koji > installation. As Miro said in another post, it's not that FESCo doesn't want to use modules in Koji, it's that we want to

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On 12. 03. 19 22:11, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: I hope FESCo will finally realize how important it is to allow building any package against modules and change the policy, allowing modules to be used as build dependencies for non-modular packages. Oh we do realize. Especially since everything will

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:17 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 at 12:02, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:49 AM Jakub Jelen wrote: > > > > > > Is there already a way to package the java application as a module or > > > we will really rem

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 4:42 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Alternative sum up: > * People (not just Mikolaj) started using modules, while Koji cannot use > modular repos. Incorrect. Koji (the software) *can* use modular repos. I know of more than one installation of Koji that successfully builds no

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 6:20 PM Christopher wrote: > Addendum: some of us part-time packagers, which depended on these > packages to build our own Java packages don't know how to convert to > modular packaging. I'm still trying to learn in my spare time, but I > don't know where to look and have l

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 3:11 PM Jakub Jelen wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 13:43 +0200, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > Hmm, > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/MQMRQVENBLDRS67WLNQ7EOCMSDI5WIET/ > > seems that people had a lot of time to act

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:43 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 12. 03. 19 v 12:34 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > > This whole process was handled in the worst possible way. To sum up: > > * No one knew Java SIG was having manpower issues because Mikolaj > > didn't know how to ask for help > > * Now it's

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

Dne 12. 03. 19 v 12:34 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > This whole process was handled in the worst possible way. To sum up: > * No one knew Java SIG was having manpower issues because Mikolaj > didn't know how to ask for help > * Now it's too late because he orphaned nearly 1700 packages to force > modular

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 12:16 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Maybe, but it will cause the removal of other packages that depend on > their regular (non-modular) builds. You are forcing the hands of > their > maintainers before the infrastructure to make modular packages > available >

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 13:43 +0200, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:36 PM Neal Gompa > wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 7:29 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov < > > akurt...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:17 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < > > domi...@gr

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 8:35 AM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:36 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > This whole process was handled in the worst possible way. To sum up: > > * No one knew Java SIG was having manpower issues because Mikolaj > > didn't know how to ask for help > > You

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:36 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > This whole process was handled in the worst possible way. To sum up: > * No one knew Java SIG was having manpower issues because Mikolaj > didn't know how to ask for help You did not know that, but the situation in Java SIG is well known to Jav

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:36 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 7:29 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:17 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < > domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > >> > >> On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 at 12:02, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > >> >

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 7:29 AM Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:17 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 at 12:02, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:49 AM Jakub Jelen wrote: >> > > >> > > Is there already a way

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:17 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 at 12:02, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:49 AM Jakub Jelen wrote: > > > > > > Is there already a way to package the java application as a module or >

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tuesday, 12 March 2019 at 12:02, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:49 AM Jakub Jelen wrote: > > > > Is there already a way to package the java application as a module or > > we will really remove all these package from Fedora? > > Most of Java packages listed in this thread

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:49 AM Jakub Jelen wrote: > > Is there already a way to package the java application as a module or > we will really remove all these package from Fedora? Most of Java packages listed in this thread are already packaged as modules. Their retirement in rawhide won't direc

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

On 12. 03. 19 11:48, Jakub Jelen wrote: Is there already a way to package the java application as a module or we will really remove all these package from Fedora? You can build Java apps as modules, yes. If we remove the mentioned packages from rawhide, it will be the only way to build Java pa

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 3 weeks)

Is there already a way to package the java application as a module or we will really remove all these package from Fedora? I am really not interested in maintaining a whole java frameworks stack, but some guidance (not these weekly emails) from java maintainers team that took this decision would b

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

Dne 13. 02. 19 v 7:33 Jens-Ulrik Petersen napsal(a): > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 5:44 PM Vít Ondruch > wrote: > > Dne 11. 02. 19 v 4:33 Jens-Ulrik Petersen napsal(a): >> I have to say I am not really enjoying this ongoing aggressive >> package retirement proc

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 01:34, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 5:44 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> Dne 11. 02. 19 v 4:33 Jens-Ulrik Petersen napsal(a): >> >> I have to say I am not really enjoying this ongoing aggressive package >> retirement process. >> If packages are not br

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 5:44 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 11. 02. 19 v 4:33 Jens-Ulrik Petersen napsal(a): > > I have to say I am not really enjoying this ongoing aggressive package > retirement process. > If packages are not broken and needed by other packages, then I don't see > why we are hurry

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

Dne 11. 02. 19 v 4:33 Jens-Ulrik Petersen napsal(a): > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 4:27 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you > know for sur

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On 11. 02. 19 8:24, Miro Hrončok wrote: This is needed for ARM by ghc:8.4 and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_8.4 And will you take it? I now see you will. Thank You! -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailin

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On 11. 02. 19 4:33, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 4:27 AM Miro Hrončok I plan to retire packages that were already announced 3 times next Monday. Which packages? Such packages that will be listed as 7+ weeks orphaned and will have no open releng ticket. Might very we

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 4:27 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for > sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraproj

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 05:04:47PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 14:37 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:26:00PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > avgtime (maintained by: rjones) > > > avgtime-0.5.1-0.17.git20150501.fc30.src requires ldc

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 14:37 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:26:00PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > avgtime (maintained by: rjones) > > avgtime-0.5.1-0.17.git20150501.fc30.src requires ldc = > > 1:1.12.0-2.fc30 > > Hopefully fixed in avgtime-0.5.1-0.19.

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 04:50, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for > sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraprojec

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 09:26:00PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > avgtime (maintained by: rjones) > avgtime-0.5.1-0.17.git20150501.fc30.src requires ldc = > 1:1.12.0-2.fc30 Hopefully fixed in avgtime-0.5.1-0.19.git20150501.fc30. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, R

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 8:51 PM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "RG" == Raphael Groner writes: > > RG> Hi Miro, winetricks should get assigned to ekulik as he's the new > RG> main admin. > > I've made ekulik the main admin of the winetricks repository. It's not > blocked in koji so everythi

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 8:44 PM Björn 'besser82' Esser < besse...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Am Montag, den 28.01.2019, 20:31 +0100 schrieb Raphael Groner: > > Hi Miro, > > > > winetricks should get assigned to ekulik as he's the new main admin. > > > > I've added him with admin ACL but orphaned

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

Thanks! Am 28.01.19 um 20:41 schrieb Jason L Tibbitts III: "RG" == Raphael Groner writes: RG> Hi Miro, winetricks should get assigned to ekulik as he's the new RG> main admin. I've made ekulik the main admin of the winetricks repository. It's not blocked in koji so everything should be OK

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

> "RG" == Raphael Groner writes: RG> Hi Miro, winetricks should get assigned to ekulik as he's the new RG> main admin. I've made ekulik the main admin of the winetricks repository. It's not blocked in koji so everything should be OK now. - J< __

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

Am Montag, den 28.01.2019, 20:31 +0100 schrieb Raphael Groner: > Hi Miro, > > winetricks should get assigned to ekulik as he's the new main admin. > > I've added him with admin ACL but orphaned the package badly. > > Can someone fix this? > > Regards, Raphael He needs to claim the package wit

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

Hi Miro, winetricks should get assigned to ekulik as he's the new main admin. I've added him with admin ACL but orphaned the package badly. Can someone fix this? Regards, Raphael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On 14. 01. 19 13:18, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

I'll take python-txsocksx. https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8056 -Gwyn On 1/14/19 6:18 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know > for sure > that the package should be retired, p

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On 1/7/19 8:56 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 07. 01. 19 15:52, Gwyn Ciesla wrote:>> > pygtk2    alexl, alt-gtk-de-sig,   0 >>> weeks ago >>>    caillon, caolanm, gnome-sig, >>>    johnp, orphan, raveit65

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:57 PM, Stuart D. Gathman > wrote: >> retiring pygtk2 retires most of Fedora desktops and gui apps, from >> Gnome-shell to cinnamon to openbox. ;-) > > Hm, sounds like there is a bad dependency in the chain somewhere. > pygtk2 is very much obs

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:57 PM, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: retiring pygtk2 retires most of Fedora desktops and gui apps, from Gnome-shell to cinnamon to openbox. ;-) Hm, sounds like there is a bad dependency in the chain somewhere. pygtk2 is very much obsolete and should be allowed to disappear

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure ... pygtk2alexl, alt-gtk-de-sig, 0 weeks ago

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On 07. 01. 19 21:11, Sérgio Basto wrote: searching by pygtk2 we have 367 matches , it is all to be retired ? No, Gwyn already took it. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To u

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

searching by pygtk2 we have 367 matches , it is all to be retired ? dnf repoquery --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide --enablerepo=rpmfusion-{,non}free-rawhide --available --whatrequi res pygtk2 --alldeps --qf "%{repoid} %{sourcerpm}" --quiet | sed 's|\(-[^-]\+\)\{2\}src.rpm||' | sort raw

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On 07. 01. 19 15:52, Gwyn Ciesla wrote:>> pygtk2    alexl, alt-gtk-de-sig,   0 weeks ago   caillon, caolanm, gnome-sig,   johnp, orphan, raveit65,   rhughes, rstrode,

  1   2   >