On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 19:48 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:51:25AM +0200, Julien Enselme wrote:
>
> >
> > I guess that in this case you mean the (co)maintainer of the
> > retired
> > package not its dependencies. Can I ask what permissions on the
> > package
> > are required
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:51:25AM +0200, Julien Enselme wrote:
> I guess that in this case you mean the (co)maintainer of the retired
> package not its dependencies. Can I ask what permissions on the package
> are required to get these mails?
>
> What I find strange here is that I am a (co)maint
On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 22:39 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 03:59:41PM +, Christopher wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016, 08:51 Julien Enselme
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the link. I didn't use to pay much attention to these
> > > emails. I'll be more careful in the
On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 22:42 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 01:34:18PM +0200, Julien Enselme wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I discovered this morning that a package I co-maintain was retired
> > (ccnet [1]) because one of its dependency was retired (libzdb [2]).
> > I
> > learned it o
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 01:34:18PM +0200, Julien Enselme wrote:
> I discovered this morning that a package I co-maintain was retired
> (ccnet [1]) because one of its dependency was retired (libzdb [2]). I
> learned it only because we have an open bug on it that change assigner
> because of this fa
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 03:59:41PM +, Christopher wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016, 08:51 Julien Enselme wrote:
> > Thanks for the link. I didn't use to pay much attention to these
> > emails. I'll be more careful in the future.
> >
>
> There's a lot of noise on this list, and those emails are i
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016, 08:51 Julien Enselme wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 17:21 +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Julien Enselme
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I discovered this morning that a package I co-maintain was retired
> > > (ccnet [1]) because one o
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 17:21 +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Julien Enselme
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I discovered this morning that a package I co-maintain was retired
> > (ccnet [1]) because one of its dependency was retired (libzdb [2]).
> > I
> > learned it on
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Julien Enselme wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I discovered this morning that a package I co-maintain was retired
> (ccnet [1]) because one of its dependency was retired (libzdb [2]). I
> learned it only because we have an open bug on it that change assigner
> because of this fac
