On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:52:59PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 17/09/2021 11:48, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Is upstream wrong? Otherwise there shouldn't be anything to take care
> > of?
>
> I think that even minor changes in ABI need a soversion bump.
>
> Upstream developers decid
On 17/09/2021 11:48, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is upstream wrong? Otherwise there shouldn't be anything to take care
of?
I think that even minor changes in ABI need a soversion bump.
Upstream developers decided to hide internal symbols from ELF/DLL export
tables. I agree that these symbols are p
* Vitaly Zaitsev via devel:
> Hello.
>
> libolm 3.2.6 introduces ABI changes without a SOVERSION bump.
>
> Upstream's answer:
>
>> The purpose of bumping the SOVERSION is so that things that are
>> compiled against it don't suddenly break. If we're removing things
>> that nobody is using (and nobo