On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:52:59PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 17/09/2021 11:48, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Is upstream wrong? Otherwise there shouldn't be anything to take care > > of? > > I think that even minor changes in ABI need a soversion bump. > > Upstream developers decided to hide internal symbols from ELF/DLL export > tables. I agree that these symbols are part of the private API and shouldn't > be used by dependent projects. > > As per Fedora packaging guidelines, I've to announce the API/ABI changes.
*Provided* the symbols they've hidden from export were never in any public header file in /usr/include, then I think they are justified in hiding them without changing soname and considering it not an API/ABI change. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
