Re: ImageMagick update

I have rebuild eom yesterday for rawhide. Untaging would force me another rebuild of eom. I hope the update won't push to stable branches. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproj

Re: ImageMagick update

Cool. What packages don't use the 7? This is from 2017, anything new since then? https://legacy.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?t=32622 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis

Re: ImageMagick update

On Sat, 2021-10-16 at 06:39 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Michael Catanzaro wrote on 2021/10/16 0:37: > > On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet < > > fed...@famillecollet.com> wrote: > > > Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in > > > stable > > > branches. >

Re: ImageMagick update

On 2021-10-15 08:37, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in stable branches. Hi Luya, Please note that soname changes are allowed in rawhide only after a one-week notice period. S

Re: ImageMagick update

Michael Catanzaro wrote on 2021/10/16 0:37: On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in stable branches. Hi Luya, Please note that soname changes are allowed in rawhide only after a one-week notice period. Sin

Re: ImageMagick update

On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in stable branches. Hi Luya, Please note that soname changes are allowed in rawhide only after a one-week notice period. Since you did not give other maintainers notice,

Re: ImageMagick update

Le 15/10/2021 à 10:22, Remi Collet a écrit : This list is not complete, at least php-pecl-imagick is missing and this one is broken by recent changes... # dnf repoquery --whatrequires ImageMagick-libs ImageMagick R-magick WINGs-libs autotrace chafa converseen digikam-libs dmtx-utils dvdauthor

Re: ImageMagick update

Le 15/10/2021 à 10:05, Luya Tshimbalanga a écrit : Hello everyone, ImageMagick is now pushed to 6.9.12.25 as a long-overdue update [1] for all releases except EPEL8 branch, which I do not use (co-maintainer welcome). Affected packages below may need to rebuild: Sorry, but such update, with s

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

17.03.2015 02:57, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:02:25 +0300 > Pavel Alexeev wrote: > >> The main question should it be done in such manner? May be it have >> worth run at least off-tree (without commits and versions bump) mass >> rebuild? It allow estimate amount of broken packages a

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:02:25 +0300 Pavel Alexeev wrote: > The main question should it be done in such manner? May be it have > worth run at least off-tree (without commits and versions bump) mass > rebuild? It allow estimate amount of broken packages and see > dependencies. Do we have resources t

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

15.03.2015 16:57, Michael Schwendt пишет: > On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:49:28 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> Right now, many issues/problems are interacting and affecting packages >> simultanously, which occasionally render fixing these issues quite >> complicated. >> >> So far I've hit: >> - GCC-5

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:49:28 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Right now, many issues/problems are interacting and affecting packages > simultanously, which occasionally render fixing these issues quite > complicated. > > So far I've hit: > - GCC-5.0 > - "Hardening" > - boost upgrade > - ImageMagi

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

On 03/10/2015 01:30 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Monday, 09 March 2015 at 16:06, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет: On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500 Rich Mattes wrote: There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

On Monday, 09 March 2015 at 16:06, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > 06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет: > > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500 > > Rich Mattes wrote: > > > >> There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to > >> -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23. >

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500 > Rich Mattes wrote: > >> There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to >> -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23. >> >> There should probably be a mass rebuild for f23, and sooner rath

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500 Rich Mattes wrote: > There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to > -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23. > > There should probably be a mass rebuild for f23, and sooner rather > than later as rawhide is currently a big

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5 there no > planned mass-rebuild for GCC5. > There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23. There shoul

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

Hello. 06.03.2015 16:51, Tomáš Smetana wrote: > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:11:03 +0100 > Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote: >> >>> Hello. >>> >>> ImageMagick itself built in rawhide. just go ahead an rebuild pfstools, please. I'll intervene onl

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:11:03 +0100 Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > ImageMagick itself built in rawhide. > > > > just go ahead an rebuild pfstools, please. I'll intervene only in > > > the case something goes wrong. > > F

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > Hello. > > ImageMagick itself built in rawhide. > > just go ahead an rebuild pfstools, please. I'll intervene only in the > > case > > something goes wrong. > First attempt fails [1] with: > > pfsinimgmagick.opfsoutimgmagick.o: : In

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

On Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:49:12 +0300 Pavel Alexeev wrote: > Hello. > > ImageMagick itself built in rawhide. > pfsinimgmagick.opfsoutimgmagick.o: : InIn functionfunction > ``writeFrames(readFramesint(,int ,char* *char)**)': /builddir/'build:/ > BUILD/builddir/build/BUILD//pfstools-1.8.5/src/filefo

Re: ImageMagick update to 6.9.0-9. So-name bump: libMagick++-6.Q16.so.3 -> libMagick++-6.Q16.so.6

Hello. ImageMagick itself built in rawhide. 05.03.2015 15:52, Tomáš Smetana wrote: > On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 02:09:00 +0300 > Pavel Alexeev wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> I have long outstanding update of ImageMagick[1] and plan do it in >> rawhide in 1-3 days. > <...> > >> Affected packages needs to be r

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

14.03.2013 12:17, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit : php-magickwand Upstream 1.0.9-2 (yes with a -) includes the fix (and the php54 patch) Thanks. It built too - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5134893 Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

13.03.2013 20:24, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit : php-pecl-imagick As you're the owner of this one, if you prefer to update it, see http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=329769 Patch incorporated, thanks again. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinf

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

17.03.2013 16:40, Rex Dieter пишет: Pavel Alexeev wrote: 17.03.2013 05:39, Rex Dieter wrote: As noted in http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14012 an issue with pkg-config in cmake is that it isn't always present on all of the platforms that cmake supports. But it is still probably the

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

Pavel Alexeev wrote: > 17.03.2013 05:39, Rex Dieter wrote: >>> As noted in http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14012 an issue >>> with pkg-config in cmake is that it isn't always present on all of the >>> platforms that cmake supports. But it is still probably the way to go >>> on Linux. >

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

17.03.2013 05:39, Rex Dieter wrote: Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/16/2013 07:38 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide ASAP. Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 03/16/2013 07:38 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >>> On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide ASAP. >>> >>> Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's ha

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

On 03/16/2013 07:38 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide ASAP. Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of ImageMagick sonames that doesn't work f

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >> Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide >> ASAP. >> > > Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of ImageMagick > sonames that doesn't work for Fedora. Will need to work

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

14.03.2013 20:04, Orion Poplawski пишет: On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide ASAP. Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of ImageMagick sonames that doesn't work for Fedora. Will need t

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

13.03.2013 20:24, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit : php-pecl-imagick As you're the owner of this one, if you prefer to update it, see http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=329769 Thanks for pointing. Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

On 03/14/2013 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Okay, looks like upstream cmake has a patch, I'll get it into rawhide ASAP. Scratch that, it was a hack for Arch Linux's hacked version of ImageMagick sonames that doesn't work for Fedora. Will need to work on a fix... -- Orion Poplawski Tec

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

On 03/14/2013 09:30 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/14/2013 02:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit : In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming scheme or not. If

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

On 03/14/2013 02:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit : In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming scheme or not. If we do, I think we need to do IM development in

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

On 14/03/13 02:49 AM, Remi Collet wrote: Le 14/03/2013 10:30, Adam Williamson a écrit : On 14/03/13 01:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit : In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to do some hard thinking about whether we want t

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

Le 14/03/2013 10:30, Adam Williamson a écrit : > On 14/03/13 01:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote: >> Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit : >> >>> In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to >>> do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming >>> schem

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

On 14/03/13 01:18 AM, Remi Collet wrote: Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit : In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming scheme or not. If we do, I think we need to do IM development in a

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

Le 13/03/2013 23:49, Orion Poplawski a écrit : > In any case, this is going to be pretty disruptive. I think we need to > do some hard thinking about whether we want to go with this naming > scheme or not. If we do, I think we need to do IM development in a side > tag to work out all the kinks.

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit : >> php-magickwand Upstream 1.0.9-2 (yes with a -) includes the fix (and the php54 patch) Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

On 03/13/2013 04:41 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/13/2013 10:03 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: Good day. By request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849065 I plan split off ImageMagick-libs sub-package and update ImageMagick to last 6.8.3-9 version. There many changes including so-name

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

On 03/13/2013 10:03 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: Good day. By request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849065 I plan split off ImageMagick-libs sub-package and update ImageMagick to last 6.8.3-9 version. There many changes including so-name bump and version scheme change from upstream: li

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

Le 13/03/2013 17:16, Remi Collet a écrit : >> php-pecl-imagick As you're the owner of this one, if you prefer to update it, see http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=329769 Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

Le 13/03/2013 17:03, Pavel Alexeev a écrit : > I plan push it in rawhide 14-17 March if no one will argue. Sounds good. > Dependency rebuild required. > php-magickwand > php-pecl-imagick This 2 packages requires some patches to build with latest ImageMagick. I already have them ready. So ping m

Re: ImageMagick update in rawhide to 6.8.3-9 version, so-name change, split libs sub package

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > Good day. > > By request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849065 I plan split > off ImageMagick-libs sub-package and update ImageMagick to last 6.8.3-9 > version. > There many changes including so-name bump and version scheme chang

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 20:32 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 21:58 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > > > >> No, I have been tried edit update which was deleted to gave way to > >> update of Orion Poplawski - bodhi said I can

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 21:58 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > >> No, I have been tried edit update which was deleted to gave way to >> update of Orion Poplawski - bodhi said I can't add it because I have not >> commit rights to that package. Ple

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 21:58 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > No, I have been tried edit update which was deleted to gave way to > update of Orion Poplawski - bodhi said I can't add it because I have not > commit rights to that package. Please see before in quote. Ah :/ so I guess provenpackagers *

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

28.03.2012 21:31, Adam Williamson написал: On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 09:42 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/23/2012 02:

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 09:42 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > > 28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал: > >> On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > >>> 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On 03/28/2012 10:33 AM, Karel Klíč wrote: Orion Poplawski writes: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't add them. Let me know if there are

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On 03/28/2012 10:25 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:17:30 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

Orion Poplawski writes: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 > > There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't add > them. Let me know if there are other builds that need to be added.

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On 03/28/2012 10:24 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 20:17, Orion Poplawski написал: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 There were already calibre and pfstools updates so I couldn't add them. L

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:17:30 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 03/28/2012 10:01 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > > 28.03.2012 19:42, Orion Poplawski написал: > >> On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > >>> 28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал: > On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev w

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

28.03.2012 20:17, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/28/2012 10:01 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:42, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Popl

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On 03/28/2012 10:01 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:42, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

28.03.2012 19:42, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: I want push now builds perl-GD

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On 03/28/2012 09:36 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17 techne-0.2.1-4.fc

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

28.03.2012 19:23, Orion Poplawski написал: On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17 techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17 auto

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On 03/25/2012 01:20 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17 techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17 autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1 ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

25.03.2012 11:59, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: * Pavel Alexeev [25/03/2012 09:51] : hubbitus does not have commit access to perl-GD-SecurityImage Ask for co-maintainer status for this package and I'll grant it right away. Hello, Emmanuel. I have asked it, thank you. But It change nothing give me in

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

24.03.2012 02:18, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17 techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17 autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1 ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 with tat build overrides but got error f

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

24.03.2012 01:30, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 08.03.2012 20:24, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Ba

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On 03/23/2012 02:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: I want push now builds perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17 techne-0.2.1-4.fc17 gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17 calibre-0.8.39-1.fc17 autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1 ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 with tat build overrides but got error from bodhi what ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > 08.03.2012 20:24, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > > 08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > > 05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

08.03.2012 20:24, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio B

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On 03/08/2012 04:18 AM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 08.03.2012 01:16, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio Basto пишет: On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On 03/06/2012 01:29 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio Basto пишет: On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana wrote: In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alex

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio Basto пишет: On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana wrote: In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto: Hello. ImageMagick-6.7.6-5 w

Re: Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

In data domenica 04 marzo 2012 20:40:26, Mattia Verga ha scritto: > Hi Mario, > I think you should try rebuild your package in rawhide. The problem is > that converseen-0.4.9-1.fc17.x86_64 is used in rawhide, but it was built > with the previous version of imagemagick and requires soname .so.4. > I

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 21:04 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana wrote: > > In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto: > > > Hello. > > > > > > ImageMagick-6.7.6-5 will land to rawhide in short time. Soname change > > > h

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana wrote: > In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto: > > Hello. > > > > ImageMagick-6.7.6-5 will land to rawhide in short time. Soname change > > happened (.so.5), so dependency rebuild needed. Does it land on F17

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

Hi Mario, I think you should try rebuild your package in rawhide. The problem is that converseen-0.4.9-1.fc17.x86_64 is used in rawhide, but it was built with the previous version of imagemagick and requires soname .so.4. If all goes well you can simply give a pkgdb build (after changing versio

Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)

In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto: > Hello. > > ImageMagick-6.7.6-5 will land to rawhide in short time. Soname change > happened (.so.5), so dependency rebuild needed. Hi to all, I am relative new in Fedora packager group. I am the maintainer of converseen and I

Re: ImageMagick update

30.05.2010 19:22, Mamoru Tasaka пишет: > Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 05/30/2010 11:59 PM +9:00: > >> 22.05.2010 17:28, Hans de Goede пишет: >> >>> This is not necessarily good advice either: >>> 1) As these la files are for plugins which are located outside of >>> %{_lib

Re: ImageMagick update

Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 05/30/2010 11:59 PM +9:00: > 22.05.2010 17:28, Hans de Goede пишет: >> This is not necessarily good advice either: >> 1) As these la files are for plugins which are located outside of %{_libdir}, >> they do no harm >> 2) In the past there have been cases

Re: ImageMagick update

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: > Actually spec file contain string to delete in root build directory: > rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la > What can happened bad if I do: > find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name "*.la" -exec rm -f {} \; > as Chen Lei suggest

Re: ImageMagick update

22.05.2010 17:28, Hans de Goede пишет: > Hi, > > On 05/17/2010 03:13 AM, Chen Lei wrote: > >> >> 2010/5/16 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)> > >> >> >> About ABI breakage there separate problem in ImageMagick - >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-

Re: ImageMagick update

2010/5/22 Hans de Goede > Hi, > > On 05/17/2010 03:13 AM, Chen Lei wrote: > > > > repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps ImageMagick-c++ > > ImageMagick-c++-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.i686 > > ImageMagick-c++-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.x86_64 > > inkscape-0:0.48-0.2.20100505bzr.fc14.x86_64 > > ImageMagi

Re: ImageMagick update

Hi, On 05/17/2010 03:13 AM, Chen Lei wrote: > > > 2010/5/16 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) > > > > About ABI breakage there separate problem in ImageMagick - > > http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org/msg736218.html > So, upstr

Re: ImageMagick update

2010/5/16 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) > > About ABI breakage there separate problem in ImageMagick - > http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org/msg736218.html > So, upstream is not carefully there and I never can't guarantee what there > no ABI breakage in any update..

Re: ImageMagick update

On 05/16/2010 02:53 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > On 16 May 2010 21:05, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> mentioned in the above link. I would say, rebuilding 30(?) packages >> every other week just for an ImageMagick update would be impractical, Are you referring to ABI changes or just rebuilds. For rebu

Re: ImageMagick update

On 16 May 2010 21:05, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: >> I just wonder about frequently of upstream releases (as I say before around >> one in week). Is it normal update it in rawhide each time? >> >> About ABI breakage there separa

Re: ImageMagick update

16.05.2010 19:35, Orcan Ogetbil пишет: > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: > >> I just wonder about frequently of upstream releases (as I say before around >> one in week). Is it normal update it in rawhide each time? >> >> About ABI breakage there sepa

Re: ImageMagick update

On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: > I just wonder about frequently of upstream releases (as I say before around > one in week). Is it normal update it in rawhide each time? > > About ABI breakage there separate problem in ImageMagick - > http://www.mail-arc

Re: ImageMagick update

03.05.2010 03:37, Orcan Ogetbil пишет: On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: 26.04.2010 05:04, Orcan Ogetbil пишет: On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Christoph Wickert wrote: repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enab

Re: ImageMagick update

On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote: > 26.04.2010 05:04, Orcan Ogetbil пишет: >> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> >>> Christoph Wickert wrote: >>> repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatrequires ImageMagick >>

Re: ImageMagick update

26.04.2010 05:04, Orcan Ogetbil пишет: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Christoph Wickert wrote: >> >>> repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatrequires >>> ImageMagick >>> >> FYI, repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires ImageMagick does

Re: ImageMagick update

On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Christoph Wickert wrote: >> repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatrequires >> ImageMagick > > FYI, repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires ImageMagick does the trick > too. > That does not detect packages that require ImageMa

Re: ImageMagick update

Christoph Wickert wrote: > repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatrequires > ImageMagick FYI, repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires ImageMagick does the trick too. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma

Re: ImageMagick update

Am Sonntag, den 25.04.2010, 18:11 +0400 schrieb Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus): > I'll plan update ImageMagick now - [snipped] > Must I notify someone about coming update? How? Is it enough write > here? I suggest to use repoquery --whatrequires ImageMagick and repoquery --disablerepo=\* -