On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 11:06:03AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:32 AM Ian McInerney via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Were the FTBFS bugs filed differently this time? It appears that there were
> > actually two FTBFS bugs filed against Audacity
> > (https://bugzilla.redhat.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 3:32 AM Ian McInerney via devel
wrote:
>
> Were the FTBFS bugs filed differently this time? It appears that there were
> actually two FTBFS bugs filed against Audacity
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2339522 and
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i
Were the FTBFS bugs filed differently this time? It appears that there were
actually two FTBFS bugs filed against Audacity
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2339522 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2339913) that both reference the
same Koji task, but then the first bug
On Thu, 2025-01-23 at 16:51 +0100, Ben Beasley wrote:
> These tests finally passed after re-triggering them twice, and
> the update[1] is now in Rawhide.
Hi,
you are right, I already rebuilt the evolution-data-server, this time
successfully (with added upstream patch). Things are good for
There was some kind of a temporary/transient failure in a part of the
OpenQA tests where a web browser loads accounts.fedoraproject.org.
(These OpenQA tests are mandatory since abseil-cpp is a critpath
package.) These tests finally passed after re-triggering them twice, and
the update[1] is now
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 21:35 +0100, Ben Beasley wrote:
> I just merged the side tag as:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-7d2ef14400
Hi,
thank you for stepping in so quickly. The update is "stuck", I guess
due to the rpminspect discovering some ABI changes in the abse
I just merged the side tag as:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-7d2ef14400
As soon as the builds from the side tag are available in f42-build, I
will kick off a ceph rebuild directly in Rawhide.
I was not able to rebuild libcamera due to GCC 15 incompatibilities. I
tried p
Results in COPR are promising enough so far that I’m going to go ahead
and start rebuilding the affected packages in a side tag,
f42-build-side-104083. Some of these packages take a long time to build,
so I probably won’t be able to actually merge the side tag until tomorrow.
- Ben Beasley (FA
I understand the suggestion to build directly in Rawhide since things
are already broken. On the other hand, I’ve already started building in
f42-build-side-104083. I’ll compromise as follows: I will finish
building everything but ceph, merge the side tag, and then rebuild ceph
directly in rawh
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 13:35 -0500, Ben Beasley wrote:
> Correction: the breaking update was built into side tag
> f42-build-side-99460 soon after it was committed, but the side tag
> was
> never merged. And it’s possible that the update was coordinated three
> months ago, and I just don’t remembe
Correction: the breaking update was built into side tag
f42-build-side-99460 soon after it was committed, but the side tag was
never merged. And it’s possible that the update was coordinated three
months ago, and I just don’t remember.
On 1/22/25 1:31 PM, Ben Beasley wrote:
It looks like the b
It looks like the breaking update in question was committed three months
ago,
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gtest/c/24e4a26153b73a97db5c86109363662636235452?branch=rawhide
but never announced, coordinated, or built until the mass rebuild came
along.
I’m going to do a quick COPR test in
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 16:21 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 08:11 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> > On Tue, 2025-01-21 at 19:18 +0100, Samyak Jain via devel-announce
> > wrote:
> > > there are 1875 failed builds
> > > that need to be addressed by the package maintainers.
> >
> >
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 08:11 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-01-21 at 19:18 +0100, Samyak Jain via devel-announce
> wrote:
> > there are 1875 failed builds
> > that need to be addressed by the package maintainers.
>
> Hi,
> am I trying to rebuild my packages too early, maybe in some m
On Tue, 2025-01-21 at 19:18 +0100, Samyak Jain via devel-announce
wrote:
> there are 1875 failed builds
> that need to be addressed by the package maintainers.
Hi,
am I trying to rebuild my packages too early, maybe in some middle time
of the merge of the rebuild tag into the rawhide? The
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 at 13:50, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 7:46 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> >
> > Once upon a time, Samyak Jain via devel-announce <
> devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org> said:
> > > Per the Fedora Linux f42 schedule [1] we started a mass rebuild for
> > > Fed
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 7:46 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Samyak Jain via devel-announce
> said:
> > Per the Fedora Linux f42 schedule [1] we started a mass rebuild for
> > Fedora Linux f42 on 2025-01-15. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora Linux
> > 42 for the changes listed in:
> >
Once upon a time, Samyak Jain via devel-announce
said:
> Per the Fedora Linux f42 schedule [1] we started a mass rebuild for
> Fedora Linux f42 on 2025-01-15. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora Linux
> 42 for the changes listed in:
> https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open&tags=mass+rebuild
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
