Yes, that is the plan.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:45 PM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> > ** Rename gnupg package to gnupg1
> > ** Rename gpg binary to gpg1
> > ** Rename gpg2 binary to gpg
> > ** Create gpg2 → gpg symlink
>
> Just for clarity, and in the context of the proposed source file
> verification
> ** Rename gnupg package to gnupg1
> ** Rename gpg binary to gpg1
> ** Rename gpg2 binary to gpg
> ** Create gpg2 → gpg symlink
Just for clarity, and in the context of the proposed source file
verification policy (https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/610):
The gnupg2 package will keep tha
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:30:21PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 09:59 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implemen
> > tation
> >
> > == Summary ==
> > The /usr/bin/gpg path representing the main GPG implementation will
> >
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:59:26AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
> Users will have to adapt to change that gpg is now called gpg1 if
> their usage is not compatible with both 1.x and 2.x.
What are the actual incompatibilities? I'm in particular interested
about comm
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:02 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implementation
>
> == Summary ==
> The /usr/bin/gpg path representing the main GPG implementation will
> now use GnuPG 2 instead of GnuPG 1.
>
This is great. This is a change I've b
On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 09:59 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implemen
> tation
>
> == Summary ==
> The /usr/bin/gpg path representing the main GPG implementation will
> now use GnuPG 2 instead of GnuPG 1.
I, as the primary maintainer of the g
