Yes, that is the plan.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:45 PM Björn Persson <Bjorn@rombobjörn.se> wrote:
>
> > ** Rename gnupg package to gnupg1
> > ** Rename gpg binary to gpg1
> > ** Rename gpg2 binary to gpg
> > ** Create gpg2 → gpg symlink
>
> Just for clarity, and in the context of the proposed source file
> verification policy (https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/610):
>
> The gnupg2 package will keep that name, right? So if we tell packagers
> to write "BuildRequires: gnupg2" in their spec files, that dependency
> will remain valid forever?
>
> Björn Persson
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
