On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:36:59AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any convention for naming patches? I mildly remember that there
> used to be some guideline suggesting form such as
> `pagkage-name-version-description-of-patch.patch`. But I was not able to
> find this codified in gui
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 1:29 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 14. 01. 25 v 16:21 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:36:59AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Is there any convention for naming patches? I mildly remember that there
> >> used to be some g
Dne 14. 01. 25 v 16:21 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:36:59AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
Is there any convention for naming patches? I mildly remember that there
used to be some guideline suggesting form such as
`pagkage-name-version-description-of-patch.p
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:36:59AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any convention for naming patches? I mildly remember that there
> used to be some guideline suggesting form such as
> `pagkage-name-version-description-of-patch.patch`. But I was not able to
> find this codified in gui
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:36:59AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any convention for naming patches? I mildly remember that there
> used to be some guideline suggesting form such as
> `pagkage-name-version-description-of-patch.patch`. But I was not able to
> find this codified in gui
