Hello
2014-07-21 10:59 GMT+02:00 Christopher Meng :
> I just want to ask here, why did you retire the pywcs and considered
> it as dead upstream whereas pypi pywcs has a new release in the
> February?
>
The functionallity of pywcs is now in astropy, is where active development
is happening. The
I just want to ask here, why did you retire the pywcs and considered
it as dead upstream whereas pypi pywcs has a new release in the
February?
And now APLpy is broken.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Peter Hanecak wrote:
I would like to take over tinyca2.
I do not see anywhere on the list why the maintainers left it. So I'll
check the procedures and also other sources and take it.
According to Koji[1], some F21 build was successful last month so
hopefully there wont be
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:38:10AM +0200, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> I thought I had retired correctly pywcs, but is not in the list. Did I miss
> some step?
The list contains only packages I am going to retire unless they are
taken care of. So if you retired a package, it is expected that the
packag
Hello,
I would like to take over tinyca2.
I do not see anywhere on the list why the maintainers left it. So I'll
check the procedures and also other sources and take it.
According to Koji[1], some F21 build was successful last month so
hopefully there wont be many difficulties.
Sincerely
Peter
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> I'd like to claim the ownership of blktap and alliance.
Is there any point in blktap? I thought, and I might be wrong here,
that it's functionality had been folded back into xen.
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:47:57AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >
> >> >alliance chitlesh, tnorth
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>
>> >alliance chitlesh, tnorth
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105945
>
> I applied your patch but then noticed that the version is also t
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >alliance chitlesh, tnorth
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105945
I applied your patch but then noticed that the version is also three
years behind upstream, therefore I am not convinced it
On 2014-06-24 15:12, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone
adopts them.
More patches:
alliance chitlesh, tnorth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i
I'd like to claim the ownership of blktap and alliance.
What should I do next? DIrectly request the ACL via bugzilla?
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduc
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:31:18AM +0700, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
> > > Package(co)maintainers
> > >
> > >
> > > ===
> > > NearTree tmatsuu
> > >
> > > The f
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> cbmc orphan, shakthimaan
I have taken this package.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Con
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:31:18AM +0700, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
> > Package(co)maintainers
> > ===
> > NearTree tmatsuu
> >
> > The following packages require
> Package(co)maintainers
> ===
> NearTree tmatsuu
>
> The following packages require above mentioned packages:
> Depending on: NearTree
> rasmol (maintained by:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:12:11PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Depending on: jbosscache-support
> hibernate3 (maintained by: gil, jhernand, msrb)
> hibernate3-3.6.10-14.fc21.src requires jbosscache-common-parent
> = 1.6-8.fc21
> hibernate3-jbosscache-3.6.10-14.fc21
On 2014-06-24 15:12, Till Maas wrote:
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone
adopts them.
I have posted patches for a few of these (some before I realized they
were orphaned), should anyone want th
17 matches
Mail list logo
