On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:04 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> I have figured it out. The package indeed does not exist on ppc64le, which is
> where the SRPM was created in Koji.
>
> Wrap the scriptlet in %if %{with docs}.
/me smacks forehead
Thank you, Miro! There's no telling how long I might have puzz
On 12/7/20 9:59 PM, Jerry James wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:37 AM Jerry James wrote:
Sorry for the silence. $DAYJOB kicked into high gear last week.
Okay, I will give this a try today. Thanks for the help, Miro and
Kevin!
Nope, that didn't work either:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/k
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:37 AM Jerry James wrote:
> Sorry for the silence. $DAYJOB kicked into high gear last week.
> Okay, I will give this a try today. Thanks for the help, Miro and
> Kevin!
Nope, that didn't work either:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=56996523
build.l
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 4:40 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 12/3/20 6:08 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> Try this (note the -n):
> >>
> >> %pretrans -n doc-en -p
> >
> > That would have to be:
> > %pretrans -n sagemath-doc-en -p
> > because -n takes the full subp
On 12/3/20 6:08 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote:
Try this (note the -n):
%pretrans -n doc-en -p
That would have to be:
%pretrans -n sagemath-doc-en -p
because -n takes the full subpackage name, not just the suffix. (That is
normally the entire point of -n, to allo
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Try this (note the -n):
>
> %pretrans -n doc-en -p
That would have to be:
%pretrans -n sagemath-doc-en -p
because -n takes the full subpackage name, not just the suffix. (That is
normally the entire point of -n, to allow arbitrary names for subpackages.)
Kev
On 12/2/20 1:04 AM, Jerry James wrote:
Hi all,
I need a little help. Sagemath packages up through version 9.1
bundled mathjax (several times! with 1 png file for every single
glyph in every single font!), which made the documentation very large.
When I built version 9.2, I attempted to unbundl
